FCN vs. ANET
FCN (FTI Consulting, Inc.) and ANET (Arista Networks, Inc.) are both stocks. FCN operates in Consulting Services (Industrials), while ANET operates in Computer Hardware (Technology). Over the past 10 years, FCN returned 13.75%/yr vs 43.55%/yr for ANET. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
FCN vs. ANET - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FCN achieves a -9.47% return, which is significantly lower than ANET's 33.08% return. Over the past 10 years, FCN has underperformed ANET with an annualized return of 13.75%, while ANET has yielded a comparatively higher 43.55% annualized return.
FCN
- 1D
- 0.75%
- 1M
- -7.97%
- YTD
- -9.47%
- 6M
- -6.28%
- 1Y
- -5.19%
- 3Y*
- -6.97%
- 5Y*
- 2.34%
- 10Y*
- 13.75%
ANET
- 1D
- -0.55%
- 1M
- 1.01%
- YTD
- 33.08%
- 6M
- 36.44%
- 1Y
- 84.52%
- 3Y*
- 62.51%
- 5Y*
- 51.43%
- 10Y*
- 43.55%
FCN vs. ANET - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCN FTI Consulting, Inc. | -9.47% | -10.62% | -4.03% | 25.41% | 3.51% | 37.33% | 0.96% | 66.06% | 55.12% | -4.70% |
ANET Arista Networks, Inc. | 33.08% | 18.55% | 87.73% | 94.07% | -15.58% | 97.89% | 42.86% | -3.46% | -10.56% | 143.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between FCN and ANET is 0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.00 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 9, 2014 | 0.18 |
The correlation between FCN and ANET shifts across timeframes, from 0.00 (1 year) to 0.18 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
FCN:
$10.96
ANET:
$2.92
FCN:
14.11
ANET:
59.73
FCN:
2.59
ANET:
1.40
FCN:
0.97
ANET:
22.88
FCN:
$3.87B
ANET:
$9.71B
FCN:
$1.23B
ANET:
$6.17B
FCN:
$462.64M
ANET:
$4.21B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FCN vs. ANET — Risk / Return Rank
FCN
ANET
FCN vs. ANET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FTI Consulting, Inc. (FCN) and Arista Networks, Inc. (ANET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FCN | ANET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.81 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.26 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | 1.28 | -0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.23 | 3.00 | -3.22 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.68 | 6.29 | -6.98 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FCN | ANET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.19 | 1.61 | -1.81 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.08 | 1.10 | -1.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.45 | 0.97 | -0.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.28 | 0.86 | -0.57 |
Drawdowns
FCN vs. ANET - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FCN drawdown since its inception was -88.02%, which is greater than ANET's maximum drawdown of -52.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCN and ANET.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FCN | ANET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -88.02% | -52.20% | -35.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.14% | -28.33% | +5.19% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -37.77% | -50.42% | +12.65% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.77% | -50.42% | +12.65% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.77% | -52.20% | +14.43% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -33.05% | -1.89% | -31.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -30.29% | -15.41% | -14.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.60% | 13.47% | -5.87% |
Volatility
FCN vs. ANET - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for FTI Consulting, Inc. (FCN) is 11.47%, while Arista Networks, Inc. (ANET) has a volatility of 21.10%. This indicates that FCN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ANET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FCN | ANET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.47% | 21.10% | -9.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.58% | 39.36% | -16.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.85% | 52.87% | -26.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.00% | 47.04% | -18.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.47% | 44.89% | -14.42% |
Dividends
FCN vs. ANET - Dividend Comparison
Neither FCN nor ANET has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
FCN vs. ANET - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between FTI Consulting, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
FCN vs. ANET - Profitability Comparison
FCN - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, FTI Consulting, Inc. reported a gross profit of 306.83M and revenue of 983.35M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 31.2%.
ANET - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Arista Networks, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.68B and revenue of 2.71B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 61.9%.
FCN - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, FTI Consulting, Inc. reported an operating income of 83.92M and revenue of 983.35M, resulting in an operating margin of 8.5%.
ANET - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Arista Networks, Inc. reported an operating income of 1.16B and revenue of 2.71B, resulting in an operating margin of 42.7%.
FCN - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, FTI Consulting, Inc. reported a net income of 57.63M and revenue of 983.35M, resulting in a net margin of 5.9%.
ANET - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Arista Networks, Inc. reported a net income of 1.02B and revenue of 2.71B, resulting in a net margin of 37.8%.
Frequently Asked Questions
FCN and ANET have a correlation of 0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ANET has higher volatility (21.10%) compared to FCN (11.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCN dropped -88.02% vs ANET's -52.20%.
ANET currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.61 vs -0.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FCN and ANET
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer