FCMO.NEO vs. VOO

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

FCMO.NEO (Fidelity US Momentum ETF) and VOO (Vanguard S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FCMO.NEO is a Momentum fund tracking the Fidelity Canada U.S. Momentum Index, while VOO is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FCMO.NEO returned 18.80%/yr vs 16.33%/yr for VOO. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FCMO.NEO charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VOO.

Performance

FCMO.NEO vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Fidelity US Momentum ETF (FCMO.NEO) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

FCMO.NEO is traded in CAD, while VOO is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the VOO values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCMO.NEO achieves a 22.59% return, which is significantly higher than VOO's 12.35% return.

FCMO.NEO

• 1D: 0.69%
• 1M: 1.73%
• YTD: 22.59%
• 6M: 20.33%
• 1Y: 35.70%
• 3Y*: 33.66%
• 5Y*: 18.80%
• 10Y*: —

VOO

• 1D: 0.18%
• 1M: 0.99%
• YTD: 12.35%
• 6M: 11.07%
• 1Y: 26.70%
• 3Y*: 24.11%
• 5Y*: 16.33%
• 10Y*: 16.85%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCMO.NEO vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
FCMO.NEO Fidelity US Momentum ETF	22.59%	13.77%	53.26%	13.09%	-14.21%	16.13%	-61.16%
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF	12.35%	12.44%	35.56%	23.32%	-12.99%	28.73%	14.98%

Correlation

The correlation between FCMO.NEO and VOO is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.63
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.58
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.53
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2020	0.47

The correlation between FCMO.NEO and VOO shifts across timeframes, from 0.47 (all time) to 0.63 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

FCMO.NEO vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCMO.NEO

FCMO.NEO Risk / Return Rank: 67
FCMO.NEO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
FCMO.NEO Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
FCMO.NEO Omega Ratio Rank: 65
FCMO.NEO Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
FCMO.NEO Martin Ratio Rank: 69

VOO

VOO Risk / Return Rank: 63
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 62
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 69

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCMO.NEO vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity US Momentum ETF (FCMO.NEO) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FCMO.NEO	VOO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.82	2.11	-0.29
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.53	2.90	-0.37
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.37	-0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.29	3.00	+0.29
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.10	11.21	-0.12

FCMO.NEO vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCMO.NEO Sharpe Ratio is 1.82, which is comparable to the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 2.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCMO.NEO and VOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FCMO.NEO vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCMO.NEO drawdown since its inception was -67.39%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -27.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCMO.NEO and VOO.

Drawdown Indicators

	FCMO.NEO	VOO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-67.39%	-27.99%	-39.40%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.91%	-8.94%	-1.97%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.82%	-19.34%	-2.48%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.93%	-22.60%	-4.33%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-27.99%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.69%	-1.09%	-5.60%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-49.13%	-3.34%	-45.79%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.22%	2.39%	+0.83%

Volatility

FCMO.NEO vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity US Momentum ETF (FCMO.NEO) has a higher volatility of 8.72% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 5.05%. This indicates that FCMO.NEO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FCMO.NEO	VOO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.72%	5.05%	+3.67%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.59%	10.18%	+6.41%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.77%	12.73%	+7.04%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.27%	17.85%	+0.42%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	32.68%	19.07%	+13.61%

FCMO.NEO vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCMO.NEO has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.

Dividends

FCMO.NEO vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

FCMO.NEO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.30%, less than VOO's 1.05% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FCMO.NEO Fidelity US Momentum ETF	0.30%	0.36%	0.25%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.28%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF	1.05%	1.13%	1.24%	1.46%	1.69%	1.25%	1.54%	1.88%	2.06%	1.78%	2.02%	2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FCMO.NEO and VOO in my portfolio?

FCMO.NEO and VOO have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, FCMO.NEO or VOO?

On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, FCMO.NEO or VOO?

VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for FCMO.NEO.

What is the main difference between FCMO.NEO and VOO?

FCMO.NEO is categorized as Momentum, while VOO is S&P 500. FCMO.NEO tracks Fidelity Canada U.S. Momentum Index, while VOO tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for FCMO.NEO and 0.03% for VOO.