PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FCLTX vs. FSPSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FCLTX vs. FSPSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Industrials Fund Class M (FCLTX) and Fidelity International Index Fund (FSPSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCLTX achieves a 13.44% return, which is significantly higher than FSPSX's 9.51% return. Over the past 10 years, FCLTX has outperformed FSPSX with an annualized return of 13.53%, while FSPSX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.45% annualized return.


FCLTX

1D
0.97%
1M
1.38%
YTD
13.44%
6M
14.53%
1Y
25.72%
3Y*
28.92%
5Y*
15.92%
10Y*
13.53%

FSPSX

1D
0.41%
1M
4.06%
YTD
9.51%
6M
12.14%
1Y
22.52%
3Y*
17.23%
5Y*
8.91%
10Y*
9.45%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCLTX vs. FSPSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FCLTX
Fidelity Advisor Industrials Fund Class M
13.44%24.14%27.80%22.34%-10.87%15.97%10.89%27.44%-16.03%19.25%
FSPSX
Fidelity International Index Fund
9.51%31.98%3.70%18.31%-14.23%11.45%8.16%22.03%-13.55%25.37%

Correlation

The correlation between FCLTX and FSPSX is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.62

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2011

0.71

The correlation between FCLTX and FSPSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FCLTX vs. FSPSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCLTX
FCLTX Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
FCLTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCLTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCLTX Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
FCLTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCLTX Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

FSPSX
FSPSX Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
FSPSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSPSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSPSX Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
FSPSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSPSX Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCLTX vs. FSPSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Industrials Fund Class M (FCLTX) and Fidelity International Index Fund (FSPSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FCLTXFSPSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.27

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.07

1.91

+0.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.39

7.16

+1.23

FCLTX vs. FSPSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCLTX Sharpe Ratio is 1.49, which is comparable to the FSPSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCLTX and FSPSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FCLTXFSPSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.49

1.47

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

0.56

+0.21

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

0.57

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

0.50

0.00

Drawdowns

FCLTX vs. FSPSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCLTX drawdown since its inception was -61.07%, which is greater than FSPSX's maximum drawdown of -33.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCLTX and FSPSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FCLTXFSPSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.07%

-33.69%

-27.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.12%

-11.39%

-1.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.35%

-13.58%

-7.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.59%

-29.41%

+2.82%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.73%

-33.69%

-9.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.48%

-0.45%

-2.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.36%

-6.55%

-1.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.24%

3.03%

+0.21%

Volatility

FCLTX vs. FSPSX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Industrials Fund Class M (FCLTX) has a higher volatility of 5.95% compared to Fidelity International Index Fund (FSPSX) at 4.62%. This indicates that FCLTX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSPSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FCLTXFSPSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.95%

4.62%

+1.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.09%

12.04%

+3.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.26%

14.80%

+3.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.86%

15.98%

+4.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.50%

16.56%

+4.94%

FCLTX vs. FSPSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCLTX has a 1.27% expense ratio, which is higher than FSPSX's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

FCLTX vs. FSPSX - Dividend Comparison

FCLTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.60%, less than FSPSX's 2.88% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FCLTX
Fidelity Advisor Industrials Fund Class M
1.60%1.82%7.91%8.95%3.54%22.27%0.60%7.40%12.19%2.81%5.59%9.09%
FSPSX
Fidelity International Index Fund
2.88%3.15%3.27%2.79%2.66%3.07%1.84%3.18%2.79%2.50%3.08%2.79%

Frequently Asked Questions


FCLTX and FSPSX have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FCLTX has higher volatility (5.95%) compared to FSPSX (4.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCLTX dropped -61.07% vs FSPSX's -33.69%.

FCLTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.49 vs 1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FCLTX and FSPSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer