FCLTX vs. FCLCX

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

FCLTX (Fidelity Advisor Industrials Fund Class M) and FCLCX (Fidelity Advisor Industrials Fund Class C) are both Industrials Equities funds from Fidelity. Over the past 10 years, FCLTX returned 13.42%/yr vs 12.95%/yr for FCLCX. With a 1.00 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. FCLTX charges 1.27%/yr vs 1.77%/yr for FCLCX.

Performance

FCLTX vs. FCLCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Industrials Fund Class M (FCLTX) and Fidelity Advisor Industrials Fund Class C (FCLCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FCLTX having a 12.35% return and FCLCX slightly lower at 12.10%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FCLTX having a 13.42% annualized return and FCLCX not far behind at 12.95%.

FCLTX

• 1D: -0.93%
• 1M: -0.78%
• YTD: 12.35%
• 6M: 14.17%
• 1Y: 25.87%
• 3Y*: 28.50%
• 5Y*: 15.59%
• 10Y*: 13.42%

FCLCX

• 1D: -0.95%
• 1M: -0.83%
• YTD: 12.10%
• 6M: 13.88%
• 1Y: 25.25%
• 3Y*: 28.19%
• 5Y*: 15.19%
• 10Y*: 12.95%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCLTX vs. FCLCX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FCLTX Fidelity Advisor Industrials Fund Class M	12.35%	24.14%	27.80%	22.34%	-10.87%	15.97%	10.89%	27.44%	-16.03%	19.25%
FCLCX Fidelity Advisor Industrials Fund Class C	12.10%	23.55%	28.16%	21.74%	-11.33%	15.36%	10.36%	26.81%	-16.46%	18.67%

Correlation

The correlation between FCLTX and FCLCX is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.00
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	1.00
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.00
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	1.00
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2001	1.00

The correlation between FCLTX and FCLCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 1.00 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FCLTX vs. FCLCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCLTX

FCLTX Risk / Return Rank: 27
FCLTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 24
FCLTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 25
FCLTX Omega Ratio Rank: 22
FCLTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 27
FCLTX Martin Ratio Rank: 35

FCLCX

FCLCX Risk / Return Rank: 26
FCLCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 23
FCLCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
FCLCX Omega Ratio Rank: 21
FCLCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 26
FCLCX Martin Ratio Rank: 34

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCLTX vs. FCLCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Industrials Fund Class M (FCLTX) and Fidelity Advisor Industrials Fund Class C (FCLCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FCLTX	FCLCX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.42	1.38	+0.04
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.11	2.06	+0.05
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.24	+0.01
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.96	1.91	+0.05
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	7.94	7.68	+0.26
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FCLTX vs. FCLCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCLTX Sharpe Ratio is 1.42, which is comparable to the FCLCX Sharpe Ratio of 1.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCLTX and FCLCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FCLTX	FCLCX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.42	1.38	+0.04
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.75	0.73	+0.03
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.63	0.60	+0.02
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.50	0.49	+0.01

Drawdowns

FCLTX vs. FCLCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCLTX drawdown since its inception was -61.07%, roughly equal to the maximum FCLCX drawdown of -61.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCLTX and FCLCX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FCLTX	FCLCX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-61.07%	-61.33%	+0.26%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.12%	-13.16%	+0.04%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.35%	-21.44%	+0.09%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.59%	-26.82%	+0.23%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-42.73%	-42.77%	+0.04%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.42%	-3.47%	+0.05%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.36%	-8.18%	-0.18%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.24%	3.26%	-0.02%

Volatility

FCLTX vs. FCLCX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Industrials Fund Class M (FCLTX) and Fidelity Advisor Industrials Fund Class C (FCLCX) have volatilities of 5.98% and 6.00%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FCLTX	FCLCX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.98%	6.00%	-0.02%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.07%	15.07%	0.00%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.28%	18.28%	0.00%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.86%	21.03%	-0.17%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.50%	21.58%	-0.08%

FCLTX vs. FCLCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCLTX has a 1.27% expense ratio, which is lower than FCLCX's 1.77% expense ratio.

Dividends

FCLTX vs. FCLCX - Dividend Comparison

FCLTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.62%, less than FCLCX's 1.96% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FCLCX Fidelity Advisor Industrials Fund Class C	1.96%	2.19%	9.45%	10.59%	4.10%	24.59%	0.68%	7.65%	13.22%	2.98%	5.82%	9.58%
FCLTX Fidelity Advisor Industrials Fund Class M	1.62%	1.82%	7.91%	8.95%	3.54%	22.27%	0.60%	7.40%	12.19%	2.81%	5.59%	9.09%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FCLTX and FCLCX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 1.00, FCLTX and FCLCX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FCLTX or FCLCX?

FCLCX has higher volatility (6.00%) compared to FCLTX (5.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCLTX dropped -61.07% vs FCLCX's -61.33%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FCLTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.42 vs 1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.