PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FCLTX vs. FCLIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FCLTX vs. FCLIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Industrials Fund Class M (FCLTX) and Fidelity Advisor Industrials Fund I Class (FCLIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FCLTX having a 20.32% return and FCLIX slightly higher at 20.61%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FCLTX having a 14.56% annualized return and FCLIX not far ahead at 15.12%.


FCLTX

1D
0.71%
1M
7.91%
YTD
20.32%
6M
18.38%
1Y
32.99%
3Y*
30.61%
5Y*
17.95%
10Y*
14.56%

FCLIX

1D
0.71%
1M
7.95%
YTD
20.61%
6M
18.68%
1Y
33.66%
3Y*
31.32%
5Y*
18.59%
10Y*
15.12%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCLTX vs. FCLIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FCLTX
Fidelity Advisor Industrials Fund Class M
20.32%24.14%27.80%22.34%-10.87%15.97%10.89%27.44%-16.03%19.25%
FCLIX
Fidelity Advisor Industrials Fund I Class
20.61%24.80%28.57%22.99%-10.41%16.61%11.48%28.14%-15.58%19.30%

Correlation

The correlation between FCLTX and FCLIX is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

1.00

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.00

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2001

1.00

The correlation between FCLTX and FCLIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 1.00 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FCLTX vs. FCLIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCLTX
FCLTX Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
FCLTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCLTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCLTX Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
FCLTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCLTX Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

FCLIX
FCLIX Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
FCLIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCLIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCLIX Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
FCLIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCLIX Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCLTX vs. FCLIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Industrials Fund Class M (FCLTX) and Fidelity Advisor Industrials Fund I Class (FCLIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FCLTXFCLIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.32

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.69

2.75

-0.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.82

11.10

-0.28

FCLTX vs. FCLIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCLTX Sharpe Ratio is 1.85, which is comparable to the FCLIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCLTX and FCLIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FCLTX vs. FCLIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCLTX drawdown since its inception was -61.07%, roughly equal to the maximum FCLIX drawdown of -60.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCLTX and FCLIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FCLTXFCLIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.07%

-60.76%

-0.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.12%

-13.09%

-0.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.35%

-21.26%

-0.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.59%

-26.34%

-0.25%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.73%

-42.69%

-0.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.34%

-7.67%

-0.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.25%

3.23%

+0.02%

Volatility

FCLTX vs. FCLIX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Industrials Fund Class M (FCLTX) and Fidelity Advisor Industrials Fund I Class (FCLIX) have volatilities of 6.62% and 6.60%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FCLTXFCLIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.62%

6.60%

+0.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.64%

15.63%

+0.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.13%

19.11%

+0.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.96%

20.98%

-0.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.58%

21.58%

0.00%

FCLTX vs. FCLIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCLTX has a 1.27% expense ratio, which is higher than FCLIX's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

FCLTX vs. FCLIX - Dividend Comparison

FCLTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.51%, more than FCLIX's 1.31% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FCLIX
Fidelity Advisor Industrials Fund I Class
1.31%1.58%8.07%8.08%3.30%20.72%0.55%7.31%11.97%2.66%5.69%9.05%
FCLTX
Fidelity Advisor Industrials Fund Class M
1.51%1.82%7.91%8.95%3.54%22.27%0.60%7.40%12.19%2.81%5.59%9.09%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, FCLTX and FCLIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FCLTX has higher volatility (6.62%) compared to FCLIX (6.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCLTX dropped -61.07% vs FCLIX's -60.76%.

FCLIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs 1.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FCLTX and FCLIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer