FCLCX vs. FIDRX
FCLCX (Fidelity Advisor Industrials Fund Class C) and FIDRX (Fidelity Select Industrials Portfolio) are both Industrials Equities funds from Fidelity. With a 1.00 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. FCLCX charges 1.77%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for FIDRX.
Performance
FCLCX vs. FIDRX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
FCLCX
- 1D
- -0.95%
- 1M
- -0.83%
- YTD
- 12.10%
- 6M
- 13.88%
- 1Y
- 25.25%
- 3Y*
- 28.19%
- 5Y*
- 15.19%
- 10Y*
- 12.95%
FIDRX
- 1D
- -0.94%
- 1M
- -0.75%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FCLCX vs. FIDRX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
FCLCX Fidelity Advisor Industrials Fund Class C | 5.31% |
FIDRX Fidelity Select Industrials Portfolio | 5.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between FCLCX and FIDRX is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 17, 2026 | 1.00 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FCLCX vs. FIDRX — Risk / Return Rank
FCLCX
FIDRX
FCLCX vs. FIDRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Industrials Fund Class C (FCLCX) and Fidelity Select Industrials Portfolio (FIDRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FCLCX | FIDRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.38 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.06 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.91 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.68 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FCLCX | FIDRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.38 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.73 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.60 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.49 | 1.21 | -0.72 |
Drawdowns
FCLCX vs. FIDRX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FCLCX drawdown since its inception was -61.33%, which is greater than FIDRX's maximum drawdown of -6.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCLCX and FIDRX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FCLCX | FIDRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.33% | -6.17% | -55.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.16% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.44% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.82% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.77% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.47% | -3.40% | -0.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.18% | -1.82% | -6.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.26% | — | — |
Volatility
FCLCX vs. FIDRX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FCLCX | FIDRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.00% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.07% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.28% | 24.36% | -6.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.03% | 24.36% | -3.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.58% | 24.36% | -2.78% |
FCLCX vs. FIDRX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FCLCX has a 1.77% expense ratio, which is higher than FIDRX's 0.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
FCLCX vs. FIDRX - Dividend Comparison
FCLCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.96%, while FIDRX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCLCX Fidelity Advisor Industrials Fund Class C | 1.96% | 2.19% | 9.45% | 10.59% | 4.10% | 24.59% | 0.68% | 7.65% | 13.22% | 2.98% | 5.82% | 9.58% |
FIDRX Fidelity Select Industrials Portfolio | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 1.00, FCLCX and FIDRX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
Find the right allocation for FCLCX and FIDRX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer