PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FCLCX vs. FCLAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FCLCX vs. FCLAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Industrials Fund Class C (FCLCX) and Fidelity Advisor Industrials Fund Class A (FCLAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FCLCX having a 12.10% return and FCLAX slightly higher at 12.45%. Over the past 10 years, FCLCX has underperformed FCLAX with an annualized return of 12.95%, while FCLAX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.70% annualized return.


FCLCX

1D
-0.95%
1M
-0.83%
YTD
12.10%
6M
13.88%
1Y
25.25%
3Y*
28.19%
5Y*
15.19%
10Y*
12.95%

FCLAX

1D
-0.94%
1M
-0.78%
YTD
12.45%
6M
14.30%
1Y
26.18%
3Y*
28.85%
5Y*
15.90%
10Y*
13.70%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCLCX vs. FCLAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FCLCX
Fidelity Advisor Industrials Fund Class C
12.10%23.55%28.16%21.74%-11.33%15.36%10.36%26.81%-16.46%18.67%
FCLAX
Fidelity Advisor Industrials Fund Class A
12.45%24.48%28.24%22.64%-10.64%16.27%11.17%27.81%-15.83%19.28%

Correlation

The correlation between FCLCX and FCLAX is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

1.00

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.00

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 1996

0.99

The correlation between FCLCX and FCLAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FCLCX vs. FCLAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCLCX
FCLCX Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
FCLCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCLCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCLCX Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
FCLCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCLCX Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

FCLAX
FCLAX Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
FCLAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCLAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCLAX Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
FCLAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCLAX Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCLCX vs. FCLAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Industrials Fund Class C (FCLCX) and Fidelity Advisor Industrials Fund Class A (FCLAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FCLCXFCLAXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.38

1.44

-0.05

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.06

2.13

-0.07

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.25

-0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.91

1.98

-0.08

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.68

8.06

-0.37

FCLCX vs. FCLAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCLCX Sharpe Ratio is 1.38, which is comparable to the FCLAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCLCX and FCLAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FCLCXFCLAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.38

1.44

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

0.77

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

0.64

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.49

0.54

-0.05

Drawdowns

FCLCX vs. FCLAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCLCX drawdown since its inception was -61.33%, roughly equal to the maximum FCLAX drawdown of -60.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCLCX and FCLAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FCLCXFCLAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.33%

-60.95%

-0.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.16%

-13.11%

-0.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.44%

-21.31%

-0.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.82%

-26.49%

-0.33%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.77%

-42.71%

-0.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.47%

-3.42%

-0.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.18%

-7.80%

-0.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.26%

3.23%

+0.03%

Volatility

FCLCX vs. FCLAX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Industrials Fund Class C (FCLCX) and Fidelity Advisor Industrials Fund Class A (FCLAX) have volatilities of 6.00% and 5.98%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FCLCXFCLAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.00%

5.98%

+0.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.07%

15.06%

+0.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.28%

18.28%

0.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.03%

20.90%

+0.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.58%

21.51%

+0.07%

FCLCX vs. FCLAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCLCX has a 1.77% expense ratio, which is higher than FCLAX's 1.02% expense ratio.


Dividends

FCLCX vs. FCLAX - Dividend Comparison

FCLCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.96%, more than FCLAX's 1.54% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FCLAX
Fidelity Advisor Industrials Fund Class A
1.54%1.73%8.10%8.69%3.46%21.93%0.59%7.50%12.29%2.79%5.69%9.17%
FCLCX
Fidelity Advisor Industrials Fund Class C
1.96%2.19%9.45%10.59%4.10%24.59%0.68%7.65%13.22%2.98%5.82%9.58%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, FCLCX and FCLAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FCLCX has higher volatility (6.00%) compared to FCLAX (5.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCLCX dropped -61.33% vs FCLAX's -60.95%.

FCLAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.44 vs 1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FCLCX and FCLAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer