FCLO vs. NORW
FCLO (Fidelity CLO ETF) and NORW (Global X MSCI Norway ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FCLO is a CLO fund actively managed by Fidelity, while NORW is a Europe Equities fund tracking the MSCI Norway IMI 25/50 Index. FCLO is actively managed, while NORW is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.33, they often move in opposite directions. FCLO charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for NORW.
Performance
FCLO vs. NORW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
FCLO
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.50%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NORW
- 1D
- -0.52%
- 1M
- -2.27%
- YTD
- 26.31%
- 6M
- 31.64%
- 1Y
- 36.12%
- 3Y*
- 23.02%
- 5Y*
- 7.99%
- 10Y*
- 9.61%
FCLO vs. NORW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
FCLO Fidelity CLO ETF | 1.70% |
NORW Global X MSCI Norway ETF | 10.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between FCLO and NORW is -0.33, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 13, 2026 | -0.33 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FCLO vs. NORW — Risk / Return Rank
FCLO
NORW
FCLO vs. NORW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity CLO ETF (FCLO) and Global X MSCI Norway ETF (NORW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FCLO | NORW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.18 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.37 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.46 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 3.96 | 0.40 | +3.56 |
Drawdowns
FCLO vs. NORW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FCLO drawdown since its inception was -0.58%, smaller than the maximum NORW drawdown of -35.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCLO and NORW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FCLO | NORW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.58% | -35.62% | +35.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -9.18% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -16.06% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -32.78% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.86% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -3.53% | +3.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.09% | -10.13% | +10.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.21% | — |
Volatility
FCLO vs. NORW - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FCLO | NORW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.06% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 12.73% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.46% | 16.70% | -15.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.46% | 21.88% | -20.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.46% | 20.80% | -19.34% |
FCLO vs. NORW - Expense Ratio Comparison
FCLO has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than NORW's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
FCLO vs. NORW - Dividend Comparison
FCLO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.56%, less than NORW's 2.72% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCLO Fidelity CLO ETF | 1.56% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NORW Global X MSCI Norway ETF | 2.72% | 3.44% | 6.02% | 5.27% | 4.01% | 1.51% | 1.13% | 2.47% | 3.53% | 3.64% | 3.79% | 2.95% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FCLO and NORW have a correlation of -0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FCLO is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FCLO is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for NORW.
NORW has the higher dividend yield at 2.72%, compared with 1.56% for FCLO.
FCLO is categorized as CLO, while NORW is Europe Equities. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for FCLO and 0.50% for NORW.
Find the right allocation for FCLO and NORW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer