FCLO vs. AHLT
FCLO (Fidelity CLO ETF) and AHLT (American Beacon AHL Trend ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FCLO is a CLO fund actively managed by Fidelity, while AHLT is a Systematic Trend fund actively managed by American Beacon. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.22, they often move in opposite directions. FCLO charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for AHLT.
Performance
FCLO vs. AHLT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
FCLO
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.50%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AHLT
- 1D
- -0.21%
- 1M
- 2.87%
- YTD
- 12.42%
- 6M
- 16.55%
- 1Y
- 37.45%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FCLO vs. AHLT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
FCLO Fidelity CLO ETF | 1.70% |
AHLT American Beacon AHL Trend ETF | 4.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between FCLO and AHLT is -0.22, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 13, 2026 | -0.22 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FCLO vs. AHLT — Risk / Return Rank
FCLO
AHLT
FCLO vs. AHLT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity CLO ETF (FCLO) and American Beacon AHL Trend ETF (AHLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FCLO | AHLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.20 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 3.96 | 0.48 | +3.48 |
Drawdowns
FCLO vs. AHLT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FCLO drawdown since its inception was -0.58%, smaller than the maximum AHLT drawdown of -20.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCLO and AHLT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FCLO | AHLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.58% | -20.18% | +19.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.26% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.80% | +0.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.09% | -9.39% | +9.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.05% | — |
Volatility
FCLO vs. AHLT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FCLO | AHLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.62% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 12.12% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.46% | 17.10% | -15.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.46% | 17.37% | -15.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.46% | 17.37% | -15.91% |
FCLO vs. AHLT - Expense Ratio Comparison
FCLO has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than AHLT's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
FCLO vs. AHLT - Dividend Comparison
FCLO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.56%, more than AHLT's 1.51% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
AHLT American Beacon AHL Trend ETF | 1.51% | 1.70% | 0.00% | 3.72% |
FCLO Fidelity CLO ETF | 1.56% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FCLO and AHLT have a correlation of -0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FCLO is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FCLO is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for AHLT.
FCLO has the higher dividend yield at 1.56%, compared with 1.51% for AHLT.
FCLO is categorized as CLO, while AHLT is Systematic Trend. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and American Beacon. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for FCLO and 0.95% for AHLT.
Find the right allocation for FCLO and AHLT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer