FCLD vs. HDV
FCLD (Fidelity Cloud Computing ETF) and HDV (iShares Core High Dividend ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FCLD is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Fidelity Cloud Computing Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while HDV is a Dividend fund tracking the Morningstar Dividend Yield Focus Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, FCLD returned 25.90%/yr vs 15.48%/yr for HDV. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FCLD charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for HDV.
Performance
FCLD vs. HDV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FCLD achieves a 26.49% return, which is significantly higher than HDV's 14.07% return.
FCLD
- 1D
- -1.44%
- 1M
- 5.37%
- YTD
- 26.49%
- 6M
- 25.09%
- 1Y
- 36.88%
- 3Y*
- 25.90%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HDV
- 1D
- 1.33%
- 1M
- -1.35%
- YTD
- 14.07%
- 6M
- 14.08%
- 1Y
- 21.06%
- 3Y*
- 15.48%
- 5Y*
- 11.09%
- 10Y*
- 9.45%
FCLD vs. HDV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCLD Fidelity Cloud Computing ETF | 26.49% | 8.19% | 21.80% | 53.05% | -41.32% | -1.59% |
HDV iShares Core High Dividend ETF | 14.07% | 11.90% | 14.16% | 1.72% | 7.05% | 6.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between FCLD and HDV is -0.16, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.16 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 7, 2021 | 0.25 |
The correlation between FCLD and HDV shifts across timeframes, from -0.16 (1 year) to 0.25 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FCLD vs. HDV — Risk / Return Rank
FCLD
HDV
FCLD vs. HDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Cloud Computing ETF (FCLD) and iShares Core High Dividend ETF (HDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FCLD | HDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.82 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.26 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.36 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.12 | 4.09 | -1.97 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.32 | 11.19 | -5.87 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FCLD vs. HDV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FCLD drawdown since its inception was -50.85%, which is greater than HDV's maximum drawdown of -37.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCLD and HDV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FCLD | HDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.85% | -37.04% | -13.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.48% | -5.18% | -12.30% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -34.80% | -10.49% | -24.31% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -15.42% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -37.04% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.76% | -1.35% | -8.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.36% | -3.08% | -17.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.95% | 1.89% | +5.06% |
Volatility
FCLD vs. HDV - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Cloud Computing ETF (FCLD) has a higher volatility of 12.64% compared to iShares Core High Dividend ETF (HDV) at 3.64%. This indicates that FCLD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FCLD | HDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.64% | 3.64% | +9.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.01% | 7.61% | +15.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.36% | 9.93% | +18.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.54% | 12.81% | +17.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.54% | 15.73% | +14.81% |
FCLD vs. HDV - Expense Ratio Comparison
FCLD has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than HDV's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
FCLD vs. HDV - Dividend Comparison
FCLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, less than HDV's 2.90% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCLD Fidelity Cloud Computing ETF | 0.01% | 0.03% | 0.13% | 0.17% | 0.26% | 0.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HDV iShares Core High Dividend ETF | 2.90% | 3.22% | 3.67% | 3.82% | 3.56% | 3.47% | 4.07% | 3.27% | 3.67% | 3.27% | 3.28% | 3.92% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FCLD and HDV have a correlation of -0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FCLD has higher volatility (12.64%) compared to HDV (3.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCLD dropped -50.85% vs HDV's -37.04%.
On 3-year performance, FCLD leads with 25.90% vs 15.48% for HDV. On fees, HDV is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, HDV has been the lower-risk option at 3.64%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, FCLD has performed better with a 25.90% return vs 15.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HDV is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for FCLD.
HDV has the higher dividend yield at 2.90%, compared with 0.01% for FCLD.
FCLD is categorized as Technology Equities, while HDV is Dividend. FCLD tracks Fidelity Cloud Computing Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while HDV tracks Morningstar Dividend Yield Focus Index. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for FCLD and 0.08% for HDV.
HDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs 1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FCLD and HDV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer