PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FCLCX vs. FSPSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FCLCX vs. FSPSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Industrials Fund Class C (FCLCX) and Fidelity International Index Fund (FSPSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCLCX achieves a 13.19% return, which is significantly higher than FSPSX's 9.51% return. Over the past 10 years, FCLCX has outperformed FSPSX with an annualized return of 13.06%, while FSPSX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.45% annualized return.


FCLCX

1D
0.98%
1M
1.35%
YTD
13.19%
6M
14.27%
1Y
25.07%
3Y*
28.61%
5Y*
15.52%
10Y*
13.06%

FSPSX

1D
0.41%
1M
4.06%
YTD
9.51%
6M
12.14%
1Y
22.52%
3Y*
17.23%
5Y*
8.91%
10Y*
9.45%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCLCX vs. FSPSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FCLCX
Fidelity Advisor Industrials Fund Class C
13.19%23.55%28.16%21.74%-11.33%15.36%10.36%26.81%-16.46%18.67%
FSPSX
Fidelity International Index Fund
9.51%31.98%3.70%18.31%-14.23%11.45%8.16%22.03%-13.55%25.37%

Correlation

The correlation between FCLCX and FSPSX is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.62

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2011

0.71

The correlation between FCLCX and FSPSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FCLCX vs. FSPSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCLCX
FCLCX Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
FCLCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCLCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCLCX Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
FCLCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCLCX Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

FSPSX
FSPSX Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
FSPSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSPSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSPSX Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
FSPSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSPSX Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCLCX vs. FSPSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Industrials Fund Class C (FCLCX) and Fidelity International Index Fund (FSPSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FCLCXFSPSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.27

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.02

1.91

+0.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.12

7.16

+0.97

FCLCX vs. FSPSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCLCX Sharpe Ratio is 1.46, which is comparable to the FSPSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCLCX and FSPSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FCLCXFSPSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.46

1.47

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

0.56

+0.18

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

0.57

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.49

0.50

-0.01

Drawdowns

FCLCX vs. FSPSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCLCX drawdown since its inception was -61.33%, which is greater than FSPSX's maximum drawdown of -33.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCLCX and FSPSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FCLCXFSPSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.33%

-33.69%

-27.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.16%

-11.39%

-1.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.44%

-13.58%

-7.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.82%

-29.41%

+2.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.77%

-33.69%

-9.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.53%

-0.45%

-2.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.18%

-6.55%

-1.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.27%

3.03%

+0.24%

Volatility

FCLCX vs. FSPSX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Industrials Fund Class C (FCLCX) has a higher volatility of 5.97% compared to Fidelity International Index Fund (FSPSX) at 4.62%. This indicates that FCLCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSPSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FCLCXFSPSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.97%

4.62%

+1.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.09%

12.04%

+3.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.26%

14.80%

+3.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.03%

15.98%

+5.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.58%

16.56%

+5.02%

FCLCX vs. FSPSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCLCX has a 1.77% expense ratio, which is higher than FSPSX's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

FCLCX vs. FSPSX - Dividend Comparison

FCLCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.94%, less than FSPSX's 2.88% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FCLCX
Fidelity Advisor Industrials Fund Class C
1.94%2.19%9.45%10.59%4.10%24.59%0.68%7.65%13.22%2.98%5.82%9.58%
FSPSX
Fidelity International Index Fund
2.88%3.15%3.27%2.79%2.66%3.07%1.84%3.18%2.79%2.50%3.08%2.79%

Frequently Asked Questions


FCLCX and FSPSX have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FCLCX has higher volatility (5.97%) compared to FSPSX (4.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCLCX dropped -61.33% vs FSPSX's -33.69%.

FSPSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.47 vs 1.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FCLCX and FSPSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer