FCLAX vs. FCLTX
FCLAX (Fidelity Advisor Industrials Fund Class A) and FCLTX (Fidelity Advisor Industrials Fund Class M) are both Industrials Equities funds from Fidelity. Over the past 10 years, FCLAX returned 14.84%/yr vs 14.56%/yr for FCLTX. With a 1.00 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. FCLAX charges 1.02%/yr vs 1.27%/yr for FCLTX.
Performance
FCLAX vs. FCLTX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FCLAX having a 20.46% return and FCLTX slightly lower at 20.32%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FCLAX having a 14.84% annualized return and FCLTX not far behind at 14.56%.
FCLAX
- 1D
- 0.71%
- 1M
- 7.93%
- YTD
- 20.46%
- 6M
- 18.52%
- 1Y
- 33.31%
- 3Y*
- 30.99%
- 5Y*
- 18.28%
- 10Y*
- 14.84%
FCLTX
- 1D
- 0.71%
- 1M
- 7.91%
- YTD
- 20.32%
- 6M
- 18.38%
- 1Y
- 32.99%
- 3Y*
- 30.61%
- 5Y*
- 17.95%
- 10Y*
- 14.56%
FCLAX vs. FCLTX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCLAX Fidelity Advisor Industrials Fund Class A | 20.46% | 24.48% | 28.24% | 22.64% | -10.64% | 16.27% | 11.17% | 27.81% | -15.83% | 19.28% |
FCLTX Fidelity Advisor Industrials Fund Class M | 20.32% | 24.14% | 27.80% | 22.34% | -10.87% | 15.97% | 10.89% | 27.44% | -16.03% | 19.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between FCLAX and FCLTX is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.00 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 1.00 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.00 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.00 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2001 | 1.00 |
The correlation between FCLAX and FCLTX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 1.00 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FCLAX vs. FCLTX — Risk / Return Rank
FCLAX
FCLTX
FCLAX vs. FCLTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Industrials Fund Class A (FCLAX) and Fidelity Advisor Industrials Fund Class M (FCLTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FCLAX | FCLTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.31 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.72 | 2.69 | +0.03 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.95 | 10.82 | +0.13 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FCLAX vs. FCLTX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FCLAX drawdown since its inception was -60.95%, roughly equal to the maximum FCLTX drawdown of -61.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCLAX and FCLTX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FCLAX | FCLTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.95% | -61.07% | +0.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.11% | -13.12% | +0.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.31% | -21.35% | +0.04% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.49% | -26.59% | +0.10% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.71% | -42.73% | +0.02% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.79% | -8.34% | +0.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.24% | 3.25% | -0.01% |
Volatility
FCLAX vs. FCLTX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Advisor Industrials Fund Class A (FCLAX) and Fidelity Advisor Industrials Fund Class M (FCLTX) have volatilities of 6.61% and 6.62%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FCLAX | FCLTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.61% | 6.62% | -0.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.63% | 15.64% | -0.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.13% | 19.13% | 0.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.99% | 20.96% | +0.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.59% | 21.58% | +0.01% |
FCLAX vs. FCLTX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FCLAX has a 1.02% expense ratio, which is lower than FCLTX's 1.27% expense ratio.
Dividends
FCLAX vs. FCLTX - Dividend Comparison
FCLAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.44%, less than FCLTX's 1.51% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCLAX Fidelity Advisor Industrials Fund Class A | 1.44% | 1.73% | 8.10% | 8.69% | 3.46% | 21.93% | 0.59% | 7.50% | 12.29% | 2.79% | 5.69% | 9.17% |
FCLTX Fidelity Advisor Industrials Fund Class M | 1.51% | 1.82% | 7.91% | 8.95% | 3.54% | 22.27% | 0.60% | 7.40% | 12.19% | 2.81% | 5.59% | 9.09% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 1.00, FCLAX and FCLTX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
FCLTX has higher volatility (6.62%) compared to FCLAX (6.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCLAX dropped -60.95% vs FCLTX's -61.07%.
FCLAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.86 vs 1.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FCLAX and FCLTX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer