PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FCLAX vs. SNXFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FCLAX vs. SNXFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Industrials Fund Class A (FCLAX) and Schwab 1000 Index Fund (SNXFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCLAX achieves a 19.76% return, which is significantly higher than SNXFX's 11.62% return. Over the past 10 years, FCLAX has underperformed SNXFX with an annualized return of 14.05%, while SNXFX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.96% annualized return.


FCLAX

1D
0.39%
1M
3.76%
6M
13.47%
YTD
19.76%
1Y
26.02%
3Y*
27.77%
5Y*
17.75%
10Y*
14.05%

SNXFX

1D
0.37%
1M
2.01%
6M
9.21%
YTD
11.62%
1Y
22.23%
3Y*
21.17%
5Y*
12.43%
10Y*
14.96%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCLAX vs. SNXFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FCLAX
Fidelity Advisor Industrials Fund Class A
19.76%24.48%28.24%22.64%-10.64%16.27%11.17%27.81%-15.83%19.28%
SNXFX
Schwab 1000 Index Fund
11.62%17.23%24.46%26.53%-19.46%26.10%20.71%31.43%-5.04%21.71%

Correlation

The correlation between FCLAX and SNXFX is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.78

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 30, 1996

0.85

The correlation between FCLAX and SNXFX shifts across timeframes, from 0.72 (1 year) to 0.85 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FCLAX vs. SNXFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCLAX
FCLAX Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
FCLAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCLAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCLAX Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
FCLAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCLAX Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

SNXFX
SNXFX Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
SNXFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SNXFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
SNXFX Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
SNXFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
SNXFX Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCLAX vs. SNXFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Industrials Fund Class A (FCLAX) and Schwab 1000 Index Fund (SNXFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FCLAXSNXFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.38

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.31

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.99

2.44

-0.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.94

10.68

-2.74

FCLAX vs. SNXFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCLAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.33, which is comparable to the SNXFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCLAX and SNXFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FCLAX vs. SNXFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCLAX drawdown since its inception was -60.95%, which is greater than SNXFX's maximum drawdown of -55.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCLAX and SNXFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FCLAXSNXFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.95%

-55.08%

-5.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.11%

-8.94%

-4.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.31%

-19.21%

-2.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.49%

-25.36%

-1.13%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.71%

-34.58%

-8.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.82%

-0.25%

-2.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.78%

-8.74%

+0.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.28%

2.04%

+1.24%

Volatility

FCLAX vs. SNXFX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Industrials Fund Class A (FCLAX) has a higher volatility of 8.15% compared to Schwab 1000 Index Fund (SNXFX) at 4.33%. This indicates that FCLAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SNXFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FCLAXSNXFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.15%

4.33%

+3.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.11%

10.13%

+5.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.66%

12.80%

+6.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.08%

17.42%

+3.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.56%

18.71%

+2.85%

FCLAX vs. SNXFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCLAX has a 1.02% expense ratio, which is higher than SNXFX's 0.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

FCLAX vs. SNXFX - Dividend Comparison

FCLAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.45%, more than SNXFX's 1.30% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FCLAX
Fidelity Advisor Industrials Fund Class A
1.45%1.73%8.10%8.69%3.46%21.93%0.59%7.50%12.29%2.79%5.69%9.17%
SNXFX
Schwab 1000 Index Fund
1.30%1.45%1.23%1.41%1.61%1.74%2.76%3.01%6.49%4.23%3.41%6.31%

Frequently Asked Questions


FCLAX and SNXFX have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FCLAX has higher volatility (8.15%) compared to SNXFX (4.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCLAX dropped -60.95% vs SNXFX's -55.08%.

SNXFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.71 vs 1.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FCLAX and SNXFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer