FCLAX vs. FSPSX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Advisor Industrials Fund Class A (FCLAX) and Fidelity International Index Fund (FSPSX).
FCLAX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Sep 3, 1996. FSPSX is a passively managed fund by Fidelity that tracks the performance of the MSCI ACWI ex USA IMI Index. It was launched on Nov 5, 1997.
Performance
FCLAX vs. FSPSX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FCLAX vs. FSPSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCLAX Fidelity Advisor Industrials Fund Class A | 0.77% | 24.48% | 28.24% | 22.64% | -10.64% | 16.27% | 11.17% | 27.81% | -15.83% | 19.28% |
FSPSX Fidelity International Index Fund | -1.94% | 31.98% | 3.70% | 18.31% | -14.23% | 11.45% | 8.16% | 22.03% | -13.55% | 25.37% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FCLAX achieves a 0.77% return, which is significantly higher than FSPSX's -1.94% return. Over the past 10 years, FCLAX has outperformed FSPSX with an annualized return of 12.49%, while FSPSX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.65% annualized return.
FCLAX
- 1D
- -1.93%
- 1M
- -12.57%
- YTD
- 0.77%
- 6M
- 2.61%
- 1Y
- 29.20%
- 3Y*
- 24.42%
- 5Y*
- 14.44%
- 10Y*
- 12.49%
FSPSX
- 1D
- 0.42%
- 1M
- -10.86%
- YTD
- -1.94%
- 6M
- 2.58%
- 1Y
- 19.89%
- 3Y*
- 13.50%
- 5Y*
- 7.96%
- 10Y*
- 8.65%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FCLAX vs. FSPSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FCLAX has a 1.02% expense ratio, which is higher than FSPSX's 0.04% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FCLAX vs. FSPSX — Risk / Return Rank
FCLAX
FSPSX
FCLAX vs. FSPSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Industrials Fund Class A (FCLAX) and Fidelity International Index Fund (FSPSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FCLAX | FSPSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.32 | 1.11 | +0.21 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.89 | 1.56 | +0.33 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.23 | +0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.00 | 1.54 | +0.45 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.85 | 5.93 | +1.92 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FCLAX | FSPSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.32 | 1.11 | +0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.70 | 0.51 | +0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.59 | 0.53 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.53 | 0.46 | +0.07 |
Correlation
The correlation between FCLAX and FSPSX is 0.71, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FCLAX vs. FSPSX - Dividend Comparison
FCLAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.72%, less than FSPSX's 3.22% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCLAX Fidelity Advisor Industrials Fund Class A | 1.72% | 1.73% | 8.10% | 8.69% | 3.46% | 21.93% | 0.59% | 7.50% | 12.29% | 2.79% | 5.69% | 9.17% |
FSPSX Fidelity International Index Fund | 3.22% | 3.15% | 3.27% | 2.79% | 2.66% | 3.07% | 1.84% | 3.18% | 2.79% | 2.50% | 3.08% | 2.79% |
Drawdowns
FCLAX vs. FSPSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FCLAX drawdown since its inception was -60.95%, which is greater than FSPSX's maximum drawdown of -33.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCLAX and FSPSX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FCLAX | FSPSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.95% | -33.69% | -27.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.31% | -11.39% | -1.92% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.49% | -29.41% | +2.92% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.71% | -33.69% | -9.02% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.11% | -10.86% | -2.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.83% | -6.59% | -1.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.39% | 2.96% | +0.43% |
Volatility
FCLAX vs. FSPSX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Industrials Fund Class A (FCLAX) is 6.68%, while Fidelity International Index Fund (FSPSX) has a volatility of 7.04%. This indicates that FCLAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSPSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FCLAX | FSPSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.68% | 7.04% | -0.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.34% | 10.63% | +2.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.51% | 16.79% | +5.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.62% | 15.77% | +4.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.33% | 16.47% | +4.86% |