PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FCIFX vs. VTTHX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FCIFX vs. VTTHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2010 Fund Class I (FCIFX) and Vanguard Target Retirement 2035 Fund (VTTHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCIFX achieves a 3.83% return, which is significantly lower than VTTHX's 7.38% return. Over the past 10 years, FCIFX has underperformed VTTHX with an annualized return of 5.41%, while VTTHX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.30% annualized return.


FCIFX

1D
0.78%
1M
-0.69%
6M
2.38%
YTD
3.83%
1Y
8.12%
3Y*
7.80%
5Y*
3.06%
10Y*
5.41%
ALL TIME*
4.75%

VTTHX

1D
1.41%
1M
-0.54%
6M
4.96%
YTD
7.38%
1Y
16.37%
3Y*
13.45%
5Y*
7.23%
10Y*
9.30%
ALL TIME*
7.97%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FCIFX vs. VTTHX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FCIFX
Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2010 Fund Class I
3.83%11.27%5.19%9.55%-13.19%5.44%10.90%14.74%-3.44%12.26%
VTTHX
Vanguard Target Retirement 2035 Fund
7.38%17.55%11.56%17.37%-16.64%12.96%14.80%22.44%-6.57%16.81%

Correlation

The correlation between FCIFX and VTTHX is 0.92, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.87

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2003

0.94

The correlation between FCIFX and VTTHX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FCIFX vs. VTTHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FCIFX
FCIFX Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
FCIFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCIFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCIFX Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
FCIFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCIFX Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

VTTHX
VTTHX Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
VTTHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTTHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTTHX Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
VTTHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTTHX Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FCIFX vs. VTTHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2010 Fund Class I (FCIFX) and Vanguard Target Retirement 2035 Fund (VTTHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FCIFXVTTHXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.29

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.05

2.14

-0.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.23

8.86

-0.63

FCIFX vs. VTTHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCIFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.46, which is comparable to the VTTHX Sharpe Ratio of 1.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCIFX and VTTHX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FCIFX vs. VTTHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCIFX drawdown since its inception was -38.09%, smaller than the maximum VTTHX drawdown of -51.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCIFX and VTTHX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FCIFXVTTHXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.09%

-51.76%

+13.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.03%

-7.17%

+3.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.77%

-10.87%

+6.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.34%

-23.53%

+5.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.34%

-27.15%

+8.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.28%

-1.61%

+0.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.94%

-6.06%

+2.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.00%

1.73%

-0.73%

Volatility

FCIFX vs. VTTHX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2010 Fund Class I (FCIFX) is 1.79%, while Vanguard Target Retirement 2035 Fund (VTTHX) has a volatility of 2.94%. This indicates that FCIFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VTTHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FCIFXVTTHXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.79%

2.94%

-1.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.02%

8.25%

-3.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.66%

9.80%

-4.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.51%

11.50%

-4.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.33%

12.41%

-6.08%

FCIFX vs. VTTHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCIFX has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than VTTHX's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

FCIFX vs. VTTHX - Dividend Comparison

FCIFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.10%, more than VTTHX's 2.75% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FCIFX
Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2010 Fund Class I
5.10%5.15%2.72%2.62%7.32%9.05%6.04%5.98%9.07%6.67%4.58%4.02%
VTTHX
Vanguard Target Retirement 2035 Fund
2.75%2.96%3.12%2.47%2.71%19.52%2.50%2.33%2.69%0.16%2.77%4.67%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, FCIFX and VTTHX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VTTHX has higher volatility (2.94%) compared to FCIFX (1.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCIFX dropped -38.09% vs VTTHX's -51.76%.

VTTHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.57 vs 1.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FCIFX and VTTHX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer