FCGSX vs. QQQG
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Series Growth Company Fund (FCGSX) and Pacer Nasdaq 100 Top 50 Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (QQQG).
FCGSX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Nov 7, 2013. QQQG is an actively managed fund by Pacer. It was launched on Aug 19, 2024.
Performance
FCGSX vs. QQQG - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FCGSX vs. QQQG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
FCGSX Fidelity Series Growth Company Fund | -6.64% | 25.52% | 8.95% |
QQQG Pacer Nasdaq 100 Top 50 Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF | -6.74% | 14.72% | 2.23% |
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FCGSX having a -6.64% return and QQQG slightly lower at -6.74%.
FCGSX
- 1D
- -1.20%
- 1M
- -8.19%
- YTD
- -6.64%
- 6M
- -2.02%
- 1Y
- 33.82%
- 3Y*
- 27.05%
- 5Y*
- 14.28%
- 10Y*
- 21.43%
QQQG
- 1D
- 3.98%
- 1M
- -4.32%
- YTD
- -6.74%
- 6M
- -6.59%
- 1Y
- 16.70%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FCGSX vs. QQQG - Expense Ratio Comparison
FCGSX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than QQQG's 0.49% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FCGSX vs. QQQG — Risk / Return Rank
FCGSX
QQQG
FCGSX vs. QQQG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Series Growth Company Fund (FCGSX) and Pacer Nasdaq 100 Top 50 Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (QQQG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FCGSX | QQQG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.40 | 0.66 | +0.74 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.02 | 1.12 | +0.90 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.15 | +0.13 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.25 | 1.17 | +1.08 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.23 | 3.99 | +6.25 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FCGSX | QQQG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.40 | 0.66 | +0.74 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.61 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.93 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.87 | 0.24 | +0.62 |
Correlation
The correlation between FCGSX and QQQG is 0.82, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FCGSX vs. QQQG - Dividend Comparison
FCGSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.22%, more than QQQG's 0.06% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCGSX Fidelity Series Growth Company Fund | 11.22% | 10.48% | 12.49% | 3.13% | 0.61% | 38.65% | 31.99% | 11.06% | 13.21% | 10.51% | 2.44% | 0.25% |
QQQG Pacer Nasdaq 100 Top 50 Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF | 0.06% | 0.06% | 0.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
FCGSX vs. QQQG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FCGSX drawdown since its inception was -38.77%, which is greater than QQQG's maximum drawdown of -23.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCGSX and QQQG.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FCGSX | QQQG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.77% | -23.61% | -15.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.10% | -13.79% | +0.69% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.77% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.77% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.42% | -10.36% | -0.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.05% | -3.84% | -3.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.88% | 4.04% | -1.16% |
Volatility
FCGSX vs. QQQG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Series Growth Company Fund (FCGSX) is 6.66%, while Pacer Nasdaq 100 Top 50 Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (QQQG) has a volatility of 8.05%. This indicates that FCGSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FCGSX | QQQG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.66% | 8.05% | -1.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.74% | 15.72% | -1.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.80% | 25.24% | -1.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.62% | 23.62% | 0.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.15% | 23.62% | -0.47% |