FCG vs. IGLD
FCG (First Trust Natural Gas ETF) and IGLD (FT Cboe Vest Gold Strategy Target Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FCG is a Energy Equities fund tracking the ISE-Revere Natural Gas Index, while IGLD is a Precious Metals fund actively managed by First Trust. FCG is passively managed, while IGLD is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, FCG returned 16.52%/yr vs 13.02%/yr for IGLD. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FCG charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for IGLD.
Performance
FCG vs. IGLD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FCG achieves a 27.71% return, which is significantly higher than IGLD's 1.69% return.
FCG
- 1D
- 1.02%
- 1M
- -6.03%
- YTD
- 27.71%
- 6M
- 20.12%
- 1Y
- 32.99%
- 3Y*
- 12.75%
- 5Y*
- 16.52%
- 10Y*
- 4.65%
IGLD
- 1D
- -0.81%
- 1M
- -1.33%
- YTD
- 1.69%
- 6M
- 4.44%
- 1Y
- 24.53%
- 3Y*
- 23.01%
- 5Y*
- 13.02%
- 10Y*
- —
FCG vs. IGLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCG First Trust Natural Gas ETF | 27.71% | -2.28% | 4.16% | 2.55% | 47.24% | 34.87% |
IGLD FT Cboe Vest Gold Strategy Target Income ETF | 1.69% | 47.46% | 19.36% | 9.24% | -2.34% | 4.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between FCG and IGLD is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 4, 2021 | 0.13 |
The correlation between FCG and IGLD shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (1 year) to 0.13 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FCG vs. IGLD — Risk / Return Rank
FCG
IGLD
FCG vs. IGLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Natural Gas ETF (FCG) and FT Cboe Vest Gold Strategy Target Income ETF (IGLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FCG | IGLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.18 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.22 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.22 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.54 | 1.40 | +1.13 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.56 | 3.82 | +1.73 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FCG | IGLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.24 | 1.06 | +0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 | 0.86 | -0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.12 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.11 | 0.94 | -1.05 |
Drawdowns
FCG vs. IGLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FCG drawdown since its inception was -97.20%, which is greater than IGLD's maximum drawdown of -18.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCG and IGLD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FCG | IGLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.20% | -18.59% | -78.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.07% | -17.56% | +4.49% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.44% | -17.56% | -11.88% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.33% | -18.59% | -14.74% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -85.04% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -74.25% | -15.16% | -59.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -65.38% | -5.24% | -60.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.95% | 6.43% | -0.48% |
Volatility
FCG vs. IGLD - Volatility Comparison
First Trust Natural Gas ETF (FCG) has a higher volatility of 9.60% compared to FT Cboe Vest Gold Strategy Target Income ETF (IGLD) at 5.12%. This indicates that FCG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IGLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FCG | IGLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.60% | 5.12% | +4.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.15% | 21.01% | -0.86% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.75% | 23.24% | +3.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.46% | 15.17% | +18.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 38.30% | 15.00% | +23.30% |
FCG vs. IGLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
FCG has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than IGLD's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
FCG vs. IGLD - Dividend Comparison
FCG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.15%, less than IGLD's 17.92% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCG First Trust Natural Gas ETF | 2.15% | 2.86% | 2.76% | 3.25% | 3.04% | 1.73% | 3.82% | 2.87% | 1.46% | 1.56% | 1.70% | 4.79% |
IGLD FT Cboe Vest Gold Strategy Target Income ETF | 17.92% | 9.91% | 20.81% | 7.85% | 4.45% | 2.24% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FCG and IGLD have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FCG has higher volatility (9.60%) compared to IGLD (5.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCG dropped -97.20% vs IGLD's -18.59%.
On 5-year performance, FCG leads with 16.52% vs 13.02% for IGLD. On fees, FCG is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, IGLD has been the lower-risk option at 5.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FCG has performed better with a 16.52% return vs 13.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FCG is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for IGLD.
IGLD has the higher dividend yield at 17.92%, compared with 2.15% for FCG.
FCG is categorized as Energy Equities, while IGLD is Precious Metals. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for FCG and 0.85% for IGLD.
FCG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.24 vs 1.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FCG and IGLD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer