FCFCX vs. LTSTX

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

FCFCX (Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2010 Fund Class C) and LTSTX (Principal LifeTime 2025 Fund) are both Target Retirement Date funds. Over the past 10 years, FCFCX returned 4.68%/yr vs 7.99%/yr for LTSTX. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FCFCX charges 1.49%/yr vs 0.01%/yr for LTSTX.

Performance

FCFCX vs. LTSTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2010 Fund Class C (FCFCX) and Principal LifeTime 2025 Fund (LTSTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCFCX achieves a 4.46% return, which is significantly lower than LTSTX's 5.01% return. Over the past 10 years, FCFCX has underperformed LTSTX with an annualized return of 4.68%, while LTSTX has yielded a comparatively higher 7.99% annualized return.

FCFCX

• 1D: 0.17%
• 1M: 0.32%
• YTD: 4.46%
• 6M: 4.81%
• 1Y: 10.42%
• 3Y*: 7.78%
• 5Y*: 2.40%
• 10Y*: 4.68%

LTSTX

• 1D: 0.35%
• 1M: 0.79%
• YTD: 5.01%
• 6M: 5.23%
• 1Y: 13.35%
• 3Y*: 12.30%
• 5Y*: 5.50%
• 10Y*: 7.99%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCFCX vs. LTSTX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FCFCX Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2010 Fund Class C	4.46%	10.08%	4.12%	8.46%	-13.98%	4.41%	9.71%	13.61%	-4.20%	11.06%
LTSTX Principal LifeTime 2025 Fund	5.01%	12.16%	11.91%	13.30%	-15.23%	10.91%	13.70%	20.50%	-6.41%	16.75%

Correlation

The correlation between FCFCX and LTSTX is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.90
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.90
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.90
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.91
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 3, 2008	0.94

The correlation between FCFCX and LTSTX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FCFCX vs. LTSTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCFCX

FCFCX Risk / Return Rank: 54
FCFCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
FCFCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
FCFCX Omega Ratio Rank: 60
FCFCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
FCFCX Martin Ratio Rank: 55

LTSTX

LTSTX Risk / Return Rank: 52
LTSTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
LTSTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
LTSTX Omega Ratio Rank: 53
LTSTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
LTSTX Martin Ratio Rank: 60

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCFCX vs. LTSTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2010 Fund Class C (FCFCX) and Principal LifeTime 2025 Fund (LTSTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FCFCX	LTSTX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.09	2.00	+0.09
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.03	2.89	+0.14
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.41	1.38	+0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.53	2.54	-0.01
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.73	11.45	-0.72
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FCFCX vs. LTSTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCFCX Sharpe Ratio is 2.09, which is comparable to the LTSTX Sharpe Ratio of 2.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCFCX and LTSTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FCFCX	LTSTX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.09	2.00	+0.09
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.38	0.60	-0.22
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.74	0.82	-0.07
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.46	0.48	-0.02

Drawdowns

FCFCX vs. LTSTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCFCX drawdown since its inception was -38.93%, smaller than the maximum LTSTX drawdown of -48.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCFCX and LTSTX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FCFCX	LTSTX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-38.93%	-48.17%	+9.24%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.09%	-5.24%	+1.15%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-5.96%	-8.12%	+2.16%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.13%	-21.01%	+1.88%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-19.13%	-23.33%	+4.20%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.17%	-0.17%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.43%	-6.16%	+1.73%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.96%	1.16%	-0.20%

Volatility

FCFCX vs. LTSTX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2010 Fund Class C (FCFCX) and Principal LifeTime 2025 Fund (LTSTX) have volatilities of 1.96% and 2.06%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FCFCX	LTSTX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.96%	2.06%	-0.10%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.16%	5.41%	-1.25%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.97%	6.66%	-1.69%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.36%	9.18%	-2.82%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.32%	9.82%	-3.50%

FCFCX vs. LTSTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCFCX has a 1.49% expense ratio, which is higher than LTSTX's 0.01% expense ratio.

Dividends

FCFCX vs. LTSTX - Dividend Comparison

FCFCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.14%, less than LTSTX's 11.61% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FCFCX Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2010 Fund Class C	4.14%	4.17%	2.05%	1.54%	6.13%	8.15%	5.00%	4.97%	8.11%	5.67%	3.85%	3.78%
LTSTX Principal LifeTime 2025 Fund	11.61%	12.19%	9.74%	4.26%	8.00%	7.66%	5.25%	6.91%	6.39%	4.75%	3.65%	8.91%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FCFCX and LTSTX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.90, FCFCX and LTSTX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FCFCX or LTSTX?

LTSTX has higher volatility (2.06%) compared to FCFCX (1.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCFCX dropped -38.93% vs LTSTX's -48.17%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FCFCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 2.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.