FCFAX vs. FFRHX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FCFAX (Frost Credit Fund) and FFRHX (Fidelity Floating Rate High Income Fund) are both mutual funds - FCFAX is a Short-Term Bond fund managed by Frost Funds, while FFRHX is a High Yield Bonds fund managed by Fidelity. Over the past 10 years, FCFAX returned 5.21%/yr vs 4.95%/yr for FFRHX. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FCFAX charges 0.96%/yr vs 0.67%/yr for FFRHX.

Performance

FCFAX vs. FFRHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Frost Credit Fund (FCFAX) and Fidelity Floating Rate High Income Fund (FFRHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCFAX achieves a 1.47% return, which is significantly lower than FFRHX's 2.05% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FCFAX having a 5.21% annualized return and FFRHX not far behind at 4.95%.

FCFAX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.72%
• YTD: 1.47%
• 6M: 1.23%
• 1Y: 5.12%
• 3Y*: 7.27%
• 5Y*: 3.83%
• 10Y*: 5.21%

FFRHX

• 1D: -0.11%
• 1M: 0.78%
• YTD: 2.05%
• 6M: 2.69%
• 1Y: 6.13%
• 3Y*: 7.64%
• 5Y*: 5.49%
• 10Y*: 4.95%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCFAX vs. FFRHX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FCFAX Frost Credit Fund	1.47%	5.21%	8.01%	11.23%	-7.83%	5.07%	6.22%	6.95%	0.89%	7.95%
FFRHX Fidelity Floating Rate High Income Fund	2.05%	5.47%	7.10%	12.63%	-1.55%	5.01%	1.69%	8.63%	0.10%	3.91%

Correlation

The correlation between FCFAX and FFRHX is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.08
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.14
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.25
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.22
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2013	0.23

The correlation between FCFAX and FFRHX shifts across timeframes, from 0.08 (1 year) to 0.25 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

FCFAX vs. FFRHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCFAX

FCFAX Risk / Return Rank: 63
FCFAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
FCFAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
FCFAX Omega Ratio Rank: 70
FCFAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
FCFAX Martin Ratio Rank: 53

FFRHX

FFRHX Risk / Return Rank: 92
FFRHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
FFRHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
FFRHX Omega Ratio Rank: 97
FFRHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
FFRHX Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCFAX vs. FFRHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Frost Credit Fund (FCFAX) and Fidelity Floating Rate High Income Fund (FFRHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FCFAX	FFRHX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.34	2.62	-0.28
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.58	6.30	-2.71
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.47	1.96	-0.49
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.89	5.16	-2.28
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	10.81	18.28	-7.47
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FCFAX vs. FFRHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCFAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.34, which is comparable to the FFRHX Sharpe Ratio of 2.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCFAX and FFRHX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FCFAX	FFRHX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.34	2.62	-0.28
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.39	1.92	-0.52
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	1.61	1.20	+0.41
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.45	1.15	+0.30

Drawdowns

FCFAX vs. FFRHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCFAX drawdown since its inception was -16.33%, smaller than the maximum FFRHX drawdown of -22.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCFAX and FFRHX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FCFAX	FFRHX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.33%	-22.20%	+5.87%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.82%	-1.19%	-0.63%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-2.82%	-3.29%	+0.47%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-10.49%	-5.90%	-4.59%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-16.33%	-22.20%	+5.87%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.11%	+0.11%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.53%	-1.15%	-0.38%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.48%	0.34%	+0.14%

Volatility

FCFAX vs. FFRHX - Volatility Comparison

Frost Credit Fund (FCFAX) has a higher volatility of 0.81% compared to Fidelity Floating Rate High Income Fund (FFRHX) at 0.61%. This indicates that FCFAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FFRHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FCFAX	FFRHX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.81%	0.61%	+0.20%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.74%	1.62%	+0.12%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.26%	2.35%	-0.09%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2.76%	2.88%	-0.12%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.24%	4.14%	-0.90%

FCFAX vs. FFRHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCFAX has a 0.96% expense ratio, which is higher than FFRHX's 0.67% expense ratio.

Dividends

FCFAX vs. FFRHX - Dividend Comparison

FCFAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.16%, less than FFRHX's 7.07% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FCFAX Frost Credit Fund	6.16%	6.10%	5.76%	5.93%	5.00%	3.65%	3.69%	4.62%	5.05%	5.85%	4.84%	4.95%
FFRHX Fidelity Floating Rate High Income Fund	7.07%	7.41%	6.94%	8.24%	3.81%	2.74%	3.84%	5.15%	4.74%	4.05%	4.44%	3.69%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FCFAX and FFRHX in my portfolio?

FCFAX and FFRHX have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FCFAX or FFRHX?

FCFAX has higher volatility (0.81%) compared to FFRHX (0.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCFAX dropped -16.33% vs FFRHX's -22.20%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FFRHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.62 vs 2.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.