PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FCENX vs. FKINX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FCENX vs. FKINX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin International Core Equity (IU) Fund Advisor (FCENX) and Franklin Income Fund Class A1 (FKINX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCENX achieves a 9.23% return, which is significantly higher than FKINX's 4.75% return.


FCENX

1D
-0.34%
1M
-0.20%
YTD
9.23%
6M
8.67%
1Y
22.84%
3Y*
18.92%
5Y*
9.27%
10Y*

FKINX

1D
0.39%
1M
0.05%
YTD
4.75%
6M
4.75%
1Y
12.43%
3Y*
10.15%
5Y*
6.33%
10Y*
7.54%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCENX vs. FKINX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FCENX
Franklin International Core Equity (IU) Fund Advisor
9.23%32.40%6.04%20.70%-17.25%14.98%9.38%8.79%
FKINX
Franklin Income Fund Class A1
4.75%12.24%7.12%8.65%-5.29%17.21%3.57%3.52%

Correlation

The correlation between FCENX and FKINX is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.58

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 26, 2019

0.66

The correlation between FCENX and FKINX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FCENX vs. FKINX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCENX
FCENX Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
FCENX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCENX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCENX Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
FCENX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCENX Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

FKINX
FKINX Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
FKINX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FKINX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
FKINX Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
FKINX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
FKINX Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCENX vs. FKINX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin International Core Equity (IU) Fund Advisor (FCENX) and Franklin Income Fund Class A1 (FKINX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FCENXFKINXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.82

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.47

-0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.93

3.64

-1.72

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.02

14.58

-7.56

FCENX vs. FKINX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCENX Sharpe Ratio is 1.44, which is lower than the FKINX Sharpe Ratio of 2.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCENX and FKINX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FCENX vs. FKINX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCENX drawdown since its inception was -31.53%, smaller than the maximum FKINX drawdown of -43.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCENX and FKINX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FCENXFKINXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.53%

-43.18%

+11.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.67%

-3.43%

-8.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.45%

-7.42%

-6.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.59%

-13.20%

-17.39%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.25%

-0.78%

-1.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.21%

-3.71%

-2.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.20%

0.85%

+2.35%

Volatility

FCENX vs. FKINX - Volatility Comparison

Franklin International Core Equity (IU) Fund Advisor (FCENX) has a higher volatility of 5.20% compared to Franklin Income Fund Class A1 (FKINX) at 1.70%. This indicates that FCENX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FKINX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FCENXFKINXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.20%

1.70%

+3.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.18%

3.87%

+9.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.70%

5.55%

+10.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.85%

7.88%

+7.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.65%

9.21%

+8.44%

FCENX vs. FKINX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCENX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than FKINX's 0.62% expense ratio.


Dividends

FCENX vs. FKINX - Dividend Comparison

FCENX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.70%, more than FKINX's 5.55% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FCENX
Franklin International Core Equity (IU) Fund Advisor
11.70%13.50%5.30%4.11%2.75%8.56%2.14%0.83%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FKINX
Franklin Income Fund Class A1
5.55%5.58%5.59%5.52%5.22%6.52%5.22%5.11%5.34%5.04%5.19%5.71%

Frequently Asked Questions


FCENX and FKINX have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FCENX has higher volatility (5.20%) compared to FKINX (1.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCENX dropped -31.53% vs FKINX's -43.18%.

FKINX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.26 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FCENX and FKINX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer