FCENX vs. FHLFX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

FCENX (Franklin International Core Equity (IU) Fund Advisor) and FHLFX (Fidelity Series International Index Fund) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, FCENX returned 10.13%/yr vs 9.45%/yr for FHLFX. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. FCENX charges 0.00%/yr vs 0.01%/yr for FHLFX.

Performance

FCENX vs. FHLFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin International Core Equity (IU) Fund Advisor (FCENX) and Fidelity Series International Index Fund (FHLFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCENX achieves a 11.22% return, which is significantly higher than FHLFX's 10.59% return.

FCENX

• 1D: 0.80%
• 1M: 2.80%
• YTD: 11.22%
• 6M: 11.39%
• 1Y: 27.14%
• 3Y*: 18.53%
• 5Y*: 10.13%
• 10Y*: —

FHLFX

• 1D: 0.78%
• 1M: 1.95%
• YTD: 10.59%
• 6M: 11.10%
• 1Y: 25.40%
• 3Y*: 16.36%
• 5Y*: 9.45%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCENX vs. FHLFX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
FCENX Franklin International Core Equity (IU) Fund Advisor	11.22%	32.40%	6.04%	20.70%	-17.25%	14.98%	9.38%	8.79%
FHLFX Fidelity Series International Index Fund	10.59%	31.96%	3.67%	18.16%	-14.17%	11.23%	8.09%	8.11%

Correlation

The correlation between FCENX and FHLFX is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.97
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.97
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.97
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 26, 2019	0.97

The correlation between FCENX and FHLFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FCENX vs. FHLFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCENX

FCENX Risk / Return Rank: 38
FCENX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 38
FCENX Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
FCENX Omega Ratio Rank: 37
FCENX Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
FCENX Martin Ratio Rank: 39

FHLFX

FHLFX Risk / Return Rank: 36
FHLFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 35
FHLFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
FHLFX Omega Ratio Rank: 35
FHLFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
FHLFX Martin Ratio Rank: 39

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCENX vs. FHLFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin International Core Equity (IU) Fund Advisor (FCENX) and Fidelity Series International Index Fund (FHLFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FCENX	FHLFX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.67	1.60	+0.07
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.37	2.28	+0.09
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.29	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.23	2.15	+0.08
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.14	8.04	+0.10

FCENX vs. FHLFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCENX Sharpe Ratio is 1.67, which is comparable to the FHLFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCENX and FHLFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FCENX vs. FHLFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCENX drawdown since its inception was -31.53%, smaller than the maximum FHLFX drawdown of -33.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCENX and FHLFX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FCENX	FHLFX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.53%	-33.58%	+2.05%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.67%	-11.37%	-0.30%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.45%	-13.62%	+0.17%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-30.59%	-29.36%	-1.23%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.22%	-6.08%	-0.14%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.19%	3.03%	+0.16%

Volatility

FCENX vs. FHLFX - Volatility Comparison

Franklin International Core Equity (IU) Fund Advisor (FCENX) and Fidelity Series International Index Fund (FHLFX) have volatilities of 4.88% and 4.91%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FCENX	FHLFX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.88%	4.91%	-0.03%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.06%	12.74%	+0.32%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.61%	15.27%	+0.34%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.84%	16.06%	-0.22%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.65%	17.65%	0.00%

FCENX vs. FHLFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCENX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than FHLFX's 0.01% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

FCENX vs. FHLFX - Dividend Comparison

FCENX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.49%, more than FHLFX's 3.13% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
FCENX Franklin International Core Equity (IU) Fund Advisor	11.49%	13.50%	5.30%	4.11%	2.75%	8.56%	2.14%	0.83%	0.00%
FHLFX Fidelity Series International Index Fund	3.13%	3.46%	2.98%	2.86%	2.60%	2.47%	1.92%	1.95%	0.62%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FCENX and FHLFX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.97, FCENX and FHLFX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FCENX or FHLFX?

FHLFX has higher volatility (4.91%) compared to FCENX (4.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCENX dropped -31.53% vs FHLFX's -33.58%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FCENX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.67 vs 1.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.