FCEL vs. PG
FCEL (FuelCell Energy, Inc.) and PG (The Procter & Gamble Company) are both stocks. FCEL operates in Electrical Equipment & Parts (Industrials), while PG operates in Household & Personal Products (Consumer Defensive). Over the past 10 years, FCEL returned -37.77%/yr vs 8.96%/yr for PG. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
FCEL vs. PG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FCEL achieves a 131.74% return, which is significantly higher than PG's 5.93% return. Over the past 10 years, FCEL has underperformed PG with an annualized return of -37.77%, while PG has yielded a comparatively higher 8.96% annualized return.
FCEL
- 1D
- -4.24%
- 1M
- -21.57%
- YTD
- 131.74%
- 6M
- 93.38%
- 1Y
- 180.93%
- 3Y*
- -41.29%
- 5Y*
- -44.35%
- 10Y*
- -37.77%
PG
- 1D
- 0.86%
- 1M
- 4.83%
- YTD
- 5.93%
- 6M
- 6.28%
- 1Y
- -3.97%
- 3Y*
- 3.69%
- 5Y*
- 4.73%
- 10Y*
- 8.96%
FCEL vs. PG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCEL FuelCell Energy, Inc. | 131.74% | -19.14% | -81.17% | -42.45% | -46.54% | -53.45% | 345.02% | -62.00% | -67.62% | -2.86% |
PG The Procter & Gamble Company | 5.93% | -12.26% | 17.25% | -0.86% | -5.05% | 20.52% | 14.15% | 39.70% | 3.57% | 12.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between FCEL and PG is -0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.10 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.05 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 27, 1997 | 0.08 |
The correlation between FCEL and PG shifts across timeframes, from -0.10 (1 year) to 0.08 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
FCEL:
$918.56M
PG:
$361.53B
FCEL:
-$5.47
PG:
$5.23
FCEL:
4.11
PG:
4.20
FCEL:
1.28
PG:
6.70
FCEL:
$167.88M
PG:
$86.72B
FCEL:
-$30.55M
PG:
$43.64B
FCEL:
-$186.85M
PG:
$22.63B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FCEL vs. PG — Risk / Return Rank
FCEL
PG
FCEL vs. PG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FuelCell Energy, Inc. (FCEL) and The Procter & Gamble Company (PG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FCEL | PG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.71 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.82 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 0.97 | +0.31 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.56 | -0.37 | +3.93 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.79 | -0.68 | +6.47 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FCEL vs. PG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FCEL drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, which is greater than PG's maximum drawdown of -54.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCEL and PG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FCEL | PG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -100.00% | -54.25% | -45.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -47.51% | -15.52% | -31.99% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -95.40% | -21.15% | -74.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -98.89% | -23.77% | -75.12% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -99.84% | -23.77% | -76.07% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.99% | -13.29% | -86.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -83.85% | -12.16% | -71.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 29.13% | 8.80% | +20.33% |
Volatility
FCEL vs. PG - Volatility Comparison
FuelCell Energy, Inc. (FCEL) has a higher volatility of 53.94% compared to The Procter & Gamble Company (PG) at 6.99%. This indicates that FCEL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FCEL | PG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 53.94% | 6.99% | +46.95% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 92.15% | 15.01% | +77.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 120.44% | 18.78% | +101.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 97.57% | 17.82% | +79.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 122.75% | 19.05% | +103.70% |
Dividends
FCEL vs. PG - Dividend Comparison
FCEL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.85%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCEL FuelCell Energy, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PG The Procter & Gamble Company | 2.85% | 2.91% | 2.36% | 2.55% | 2.38% | 2.08% | 2.24% | 2.37% | 3.09% | 2.98% | 3.18% | 3.31% |
Financials
FCEL vs. PG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between FuelCell Energy, Inc. and The Procter & Gamble Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
FCEL and PG have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FCEL has higher volatility (53.94%) compared to PG (6.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCEL dropped -100.00% vs PG's -54.25%.
FCEL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.41 vs -0.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FCEL and PG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer