FCEEX vs. GLLSX
Compare and contrast key facts about Franklin Emerging Market Core Equity (IU) Fund Advisor (FCEEX) and abrdn Emerging Markets ex-China Fund (GLLSX).
FCEEX is managed by Franklin Templeton. It was launched on Jul 31, 2019. GLLSX is managed by Aberdeen. It was launched on Aug 29, 2000.
Performance
FCEEX vs. GLLSX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FCEEX achieves a 5.69% return, which is significantly lower than GLLSX's 9.64% return.
FCEEX
- 1D
- -0.71%
- 1M
- -2.38%
- YTD
- 5.69%
- 6M
- 7.69%
- 1Y
- 42.34%
- 3Y*
- 19.15%
- 5Y*
- 6.26%
- 10Y*
- —
GLLSX
- 1D
- -1.45%
- 1M
- -3.45%
- YTD
- 9.64%
- 6M
- 17.63%
- 1Y
- 63.10%
- 3Y*
- 19.26%
- 5Y*
- 12.76%
- 10Y*
- 12.02%
FCEEX vs. GLLSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCEEX Franklin Emerging Market Core Equity (IU) Fund Advisor | 5.69% | 34.81% | 10.51% | 12.52% | -16.96% | -1.29% | 10.19% | 9.77% |
GLLSX abrdn Emerging Markets ex-China Fund | 9.64% | 34.81% | 0.73% | 21.35% | -23.04% | 36.50% | 15.93% | 9.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between FCEEX and GLLSX is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification — they'll tend to fall together during downturns. For meaningful risk reduction, look for holdings with correlations below 0.5.
FCEEX vs. GLLSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FCEEX has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is lower than GLLSX's 1.23% expense ratio.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FCEEX vs. GLLSX — Risk / Return Rank
FCEEX
GLLSX
FCEEX vs. GLLSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Emerging Market Core Equity (IU) Fund Advisor (FCEEX) and abrdn Emerging Markets ex-China Fund (GLLSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FCEEX | GLLSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.02 | 2.65 | -0.63 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.60 | 3.24 | -0.64 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.49 | -0.11 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.84 | 3.70 | -0.86 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.95 | 14.93 | -3.99 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FCEEX | GLLSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.02 | 2.65 | -0.63 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.38 | 0.74 | -0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.69 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.50 | 0.57 | -0.07 |
Drawdowns
FCEEX vs. GLLSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FCEEX drawdown since its inception was -34.68%, which is greater than GLLSX's maximum drawdown of -32.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCEEX and GLLSX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FCEEX | GLLSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.68% | -32.59% | -2.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.98% | -14.39% | +1.41% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.96% | -30.02% | -3.94% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -32.59% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.67% | -11.00% | +1.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.49% | -8.00% | -3.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.36% | 3.56% | -0.20% |
Volatility
FCEEX vs. GLLSX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Franklin Emerging Market Core Equity (IU) Fund Advisor (FCEEX) is 7.72%, while abrdn Emerging Markets ex-China Fund (GLLSX) has a volatility of 10.04%. This indicates that FCEEX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLLSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FCEEX | GLLSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.72% | 10.04% | -2.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.55% | 16.06% | -2.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.90% | 19.87% | -1.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.58% | 17.29% | -0.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.19% | 17.38% | +0.81% |
Dividends
FCEEX vs. GLLSX - Dividend Comparison
FCEEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.11%, more than GLLSX's 1.71% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCEEX Franklin Emerging Market Core Equity (IU) Fund Advisor | 3.11% | 3.29% | 4.17% | 4.36% | 4.08% | 3.38% | 2.98% | 0.40% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GLLSX abrdn Emerging Markets ex-China Fund | 1.71% | 1.88% | 0.74% | 0.77% | 29.32% | 22.85% | 0.00% | 3.38% | 9.47% | 8.40% | 1.09% | 0.94% |