FCCVX vs. LBFFX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FCCVX (Fidelity Advisor Convertible Securities Fund Class C) and LBFFX (Lord Abbett Convertible Fund Class F) are both Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds funds. Over the past 10 years, FCCVX returned 12.17%/yr vs 13.36%/yr for LBFFX. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FCCVX charges 1.74%/yr vs 0.93%/yr for LBFFX.

Performance

FCCVX vs. LBFFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Convertible Securities Fund Class C (FCCVX) and Lord Abbett Convertible Fund Class F (LBFFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCCVX achieves a 24.86% return, which is significantly higher than LBFFX's 22.45% return. Over the past 10 years, FCCVX has underperformed LBFFX with an annualized return of 12.17%, while LBFFX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.36% annualized return.

FCCVX

• 1D: 1.15%
• 1M: 7.30%
• YTD: 24.86%
• 6M: 24.23%
• 1Y: 43.01%
• 3Y*: 18.48%
• 5Y*: 8.56%
• 10Y*: 12.17%

LBFFX

• 1D: 0.93%
• 1M: 5.66%
• YTD: 22.45%
• 6M: 22.84%
• 1Y: 42.04%
• 3Y*: 21.29%
• 5Y*: 7.29%
• 10Y*: 13.36%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCCVX vs. LBFFX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FCCVX Fidelity Advisor Convertible Securities Fund Class C	24.86%	17.04%	7.28%	10.24%	-16.22%	8.77%	41.00%	27.26%	-2.32%	8.22%
LBFFX Lord Abbett Convertible Fund Class F	22.45%	22.11%	13.82%	7.16%	-23.30%	1.26%	64.16%	24.19%	-5.89%	16.68%

Correlation

The correlation between FCCVX and LBFFX is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.95
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.93
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.94
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.93
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2009	0.93

The correlation between FCCVX and LBFFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FCCVX vs. LBFFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCCVX

FCCVX Risk / Return Rank: 88
FCCVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
FCCVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
FCCVX Omega Ratio Rank: 78
FCCVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
FCCVX Martin Ratio Rank: 96

LBFFX

LBFFX Risk / Return Rank: 88
LBFFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
LBFFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
LBFFX Omega Ratio Rank: 78
LBFFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
LBFFX Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCCVX vs. LBFFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Convertible Securities Fund Class C (FCCVX) and Lord Abbett Convertible Fund Class F (LBFFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FCCVX	LBFFX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.99	2.93	+0.05
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.85	3.81	+0.03
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.51	1.51	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	6.14	6.10	+0.04
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	23.77	22.79	+0.98
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FCCVX vs. LBFFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCCVX Sharpe Ratio is 2.99, which is comparable to the LBFFX Sharpe Ratio of 2.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCCVX and LBFFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FCCVX	LBFFX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.99	2.93	+0.05
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.64	0.56	+0.08
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.90	0.98	-0.09
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.95	0.69	+0.27

Drawdowns

FCCVX vs. LBFFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCCVX drawdown since its inception was -25.13%, smaller than the maximum LBFFX drawdown of -41.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCCVX and LBFFX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FCCVX	LBFFX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-25.13%	-41.13%	+16.00%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.21%	-7.07%	-0.14%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.98%	-12.15%	-6.83%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.66%	-30.86%	+6.20%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-25.13%	-33.61%	+8.48%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.19%	-10.31%	+4.12%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.86%	1.89%	-0.03%

Volatility

FCCVX vs. LBFFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Convertible Securities Fund Class C (FCCVX) is 4.85%, while Lord Abbett Convertible Fund Class F (LBFFX) has a volatility of 5.38%. This indicates that FCCVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LBFFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FCCVX	LBFFX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.85%	5.38%	-0.53%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.83%	12.19%	-0.36%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.82%	14.72%	+0.10%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.46%	13.00%	+0.46%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.64%	13.67%	-0.03%

FCCVX vs. LBFFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCCVX has a 1.74% expense ratio, which is higher than LBFFX's 0.93% expense ratio.

Dividends

FCCVX vs. LBFFX - Dividend Comparison

FCCVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.06%, more than LBFFX's 1.22% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FCCVX Fidelity Advisor Convertible Securities Fund Class C	8.06%	10.47%	1.32%	1.12%	2.62%	19.63%	9.96%	2.31%	8.75%	3.35%	3.85%	9.24%
LBFFX Lord Abbett Convertible Fund Class F	1.22%	1.80%	2.22%	1.95%	2.60%	18.44%	16.27%	8.71%	4.91%	2.47%	3.64%	3.38%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FCCVX and LBFFX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.95, FCCVX and LBFFX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FCCVX or LBFFX?

LBFFX has higher volatility (5.38%) compared to FCCVX (4.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCCVX dropped -25.13% vs LBFFX's -41.13%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FCCVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.99 vs 2.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.