FCCVX vs. VVL.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Advisor Convertible Securities Fund Class C (FCCVX) and Vanguard Global Value Factor ETF CAD (VVL.TO).
FCCVX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Feb 19, 2009. VVL.TO is an actively managed fund by Vanguard. It was launched on Jun 14, 2016.
Performance
FCCVX vs. VVL.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FCCVX vs. VVL.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCCVX Fidelity Advisor Convertible Securities Fund Class C | 1.14% | 17.04% | 7.28% | 10.24% | -16.22% | 8.77% | 41.00% | 27.26% | -2.32% | 8.22% |
VVL.TO Vanguard Global Value Factor ETF CAD | 2.47% | 27.35% | 5.88% | 19.17% | -6.27% | 30.69% | -1.39% | 19.05% | -16.46% | 20.07% |
Different Trading Currencies
FCCVX is traded in USD, while VVL.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the VVL.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FCCVX achieves a 1.14% return, which is significantly lower than VVL.TO's 2.47% return.
FCCVX
- 1D
- -1.68%
- 1M
- -5.66%
- YTD
- 1.14%
- 6M
- 2.02%
- 1Y
- 23.28%
- 3Y*
- 10.49%
- 5Y*
- 4.24%
- 10Y*
- 10.03%
VVL.TO
- 1D
- 2.15%
- 1M
- -5.44%
- YTD
- 2.47%
- 6M
- 8.81%
- 1Y
- 29.13%
- 3Y*
- 17.42%
- 5Y*
- 10.96%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FCCVX vs. VVL.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
FCCVX has a 1.74% expense ratio, which is higher than VVL.TO's 0.38% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FCCVX vs. VVL.TO — Risk / Return Rank
FCCVX
VVL.TO
FCCVX vs. VVL.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Convertible Securities Fund Class C (FCCVX) and Vanguard Global Value Factor ETF CAD (VVL.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FCCVX | VVL.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.47 | 1.46 | +0.01 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.02 | 2.10 | -0.08 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.31 | -0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.71 | 2.05 | +0.66 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.09 | 9.03 | +1.06 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FCCVX | VVL.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.47 | 1.46 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 | 0.59 | -0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.75 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.86 | 0.51 | +0.35 |
Correlation
The correlation between FCCVX and VVL.TO is 0.66, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
FCCVX vs. VVL.TO - Dividend Comparison
FCCVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.35%, more than VVL.TO's 1.82% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCCVX Fidelity Advisor Convertible Securities Fund Class C | 10.35% | 10.47% | 1.32% | 1.12% | 2.62% | 19.63% | 9.96% | 2.31% | 8.75% | 3.35% | 3.85% | 9.24% |
VVL.TO Vanguard Global Value Factor ETF CAD | 1.82% | 1.89% | 2.19% | 2.65% | 2.52% | 1.48% | 1.67% | 2.60% | 2.11% | 1.33% | 0.59% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
FCCVX vs. VVL.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FCCVX drawdown since its inception was -25.13%, smaller than the maximum VVL.TO drawdown of -50.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCCVX and VVL.TO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FCCVX | VVL.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.13% | -43.93% | +18.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.75% | -14.38% | +6.63% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.66% | -18.10% | -6.56% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -25.13% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.87% | -4.83% | -2.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.24% | -5.79% | -0.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.08% | 3.63% | -1.55% |
Volatility
FCCVX vs. VVL.TO - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Advisor Convertible Securities Fund Class C (FCCVX) has a higher volatility of 6.32% compared to Vanguard Global Value Factor ETF CAD (VVL.TO) at 5.34%. This indicates that FCCVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VVL.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FCCVX | VVL.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.32% | 5.34% | +0.98% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.07% | 10.52% | +1.55% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.64% | 20.05% | -4.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.34% | 18.59% | -5.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.50% | 21.25% | -7.75% |