FCBD vs. IBTO
FCBD (Frontier Asset Core Bond ETF) and IBTO (iShares iBonds Dec 2033 Term Treasury ETF) are both Intermediate Core Bond funds. FCBD is actively managed, while IBTO is passively managed. Over the past year, FCBD returned 2.36% vs 1.06% for IBTO. Their correlation of 0.92 means they have usually moved in the same direction. FCBD charges 0.90%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for IBTO.
Performance
FCBD vs. IBTO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FCBD achieves a 0.21% return, which is significantly higher than IBTO's -0.96% return.
FCBD
- 1D
- 0.18%
- 1M
- -0.40%
- 6M
- 0.09%
- YTD
- 0.21%
- 1Y
- 2.36%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 3.97%
IBTO
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- -0.85%
- 6M
- -0.62%
- YTD
- -0.96%
- 1Y
- 1.06%
- 3Y*
- 3.03%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 2.54%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $52.16K | $72.83K | $91.38K | |
| $4.96M | $3.13M | $2.14M |
FCBD vs. IBTO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
FCBD Frontier Asset Core Bond ETF | 0.21% | 6.29% | -0.02% |
IBTO iShares iBonds Dec 2033 Term Treasury ETF | -0.96% | 8.23% | 0.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between FCBD and IBTO is 0.90, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 20, 2024 | 0.92 |
The correlation between FCBD and IBTO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FCBD vs. IBTO — Risk / Return Rank
FCBD
IBTO
FCBD vs. IBTO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Frontier Asset Core Bond ETF (FCBD) and iShares iBonds Dec 2033 Term Treasury ETF (IBTO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FCBD | IBTO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.79 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.04 | +0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.44 | 0.29 | +1.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.79 | 0.65 | +3.13 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FCBD vs. IBTO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FCBD drawdown since its inception was -1.64%, smaller than the maximum IBTO drawdown of -8.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCBD and IBTO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FCBD | IBTO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.64% | -8.36% | +6.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.64% | -3.66% | +2.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -6.91% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.99% | -3.01% | +2.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.40% | -2.38% | +1.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.62% | 1.62% | -1.00% |
Volatility
FCBD vs. IBTO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Frontier Asset Core Bond ETF (FCBD) is 0.64%, while iShares iBonds Dec 2033 Term Treasury ETF (IBTO) has a volatility of 1.06%. This indicates that FCBD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IBTO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FCBD | IBTO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.64% | 1.06% | -0.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.85% | 3.29% | -1.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.27% | 4.16% | -1.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.57% | 6.51% | -3.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.57% | 6.51% | -3.94% |
FCBD vs. IBTO - Expense Ratio Comparison
FCBD has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than IBTO's 0.07% expense ratio.
Dividends
FCBD vs. IBTO - Dividend Comparison
FCBD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.18%, which matches IBTO's 4.20% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
FCBD Frontier Asset Core Bond ETF | 4.18% | 4.34% | 0.08% | 0.00% |
IBTO iShares iBonds Dec 2033 Term Treasury ETF | 4.20% | 4.05% | 4.23% | 1.66% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FCBD and IBTO have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IBTO has higher volatility (1.06%) compared to FCBD (0.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCBD dropped -1.64% vs IBTO's -8.36%.
On 1-year performance, FCBD leads with 2.36% vs 1.06% for IBTO. On fees, IBTO is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, FCBD has been the lower-risk option at 0.64%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, FCBD has performed better with a 2.36% return vs 1.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IBTO is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for FCBD.
IBTO has the higher dividend yield at 4.20%, compared with 4.18% for FCBD.
They also come from different issuers: Frontier and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for FCBD and 0.07% for IBTO.
FCBD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.05 vs 0.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FCBD and IBTO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer