PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FCBD vs. IBTO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FCBD vs. IBTO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Frontier Asset Core Bond ETF (FCBD) and iShares iBonds Dec 2033 Term Treasury ETF (IBTO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCBD achieves a 0.52% return, which is significantly higher than IBTO's -0.53% return.


FCBD

1D
0.12%
1M
0.48%
YTD
0.52%
6M
0.67%
1Y
3.77%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

IBTO

1D
0.10%
1M
0.47%
YTD
-0.53%
6M
-0.45%
1Y
2.97%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCBD vs. IBTO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
FCBD
Frontier Asset Core Bond ETF
0.52%6.29%-0.02%
IBTO
iShares iBonds Dec 2033 Term Treasury ETF
-0.53%8.23%0.15%

Correlation

The correlation between FCBD and IBTO is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 20, 2024

0.92

The correlation between FCBD and IBTO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FCBD vs. IBTO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCBD
FCBD Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
FCBD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCBD Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCBD Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
FCBD Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCBD Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

IBTO
IBTO Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
IBTO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBTO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBTO Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
IBTO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBTO Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCBD vs. IBTO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Frontier Asset Core Bond ETF (FCBD) and iShares iBonds Dec 2033 Term Treasury ETF (IBTO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FCBDIBTODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.94

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.12

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.30

0.82

+1.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.66

2.14

+4.52

FCBD vs. IBTO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCBD Sharpe Ratio is 1.62, which is higher than the IBTO Sharpe Ratio of 0.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCBD and IBTO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FCBD vs. IBTO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCBD drawdown since its inception was -1.64%, smaller than the maximum IBTO drawdown of -8.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCBD and IBTO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FCBDIBTODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.64%

-8.36%

+6.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.64%

-3.66%

+2.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.69%

-2.59%

+1.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.37%

-2.37%

+2.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.57%

1.39%

-0.82%

Volatility

FCBD vs. IBTO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Frontier Asset Core Bond ETF (FCBD) is 0.75%, while iShares iBonds Dec 2033 Term Treasury ETF (IBTO) has a volatility of 1.27%. This indicates that FCBD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IBTO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FCBDIBTODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.75%

1.27%

-0.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.79%

3.14%

-1.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.34%

4.39%

-2.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.60%

6.59%

-3.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.60%

6.59%

-3.99%

FCBD vs. IBTO - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCBD has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than IBTO's 0.07% expense ratio.


Dividends

FCBD vs. IBTO - Dividend Comparison

FCBD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.22%, more than IBTO's 4.15% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
FCBD
Frontier Asset Core Bond ETF
4.22%4.34%0.08%0.00%
IBTO
iShares iBonds Dec 2033 Term Treasury ETF
4.15%4.05%4.23%1.66%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, FCBD and IBTO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

IBTO has higher volatility (1.27%) compared to FCBD (0.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCBD dropped -1.64% vs IBTO's -8.36%.

On 1-year performance, FCBD leads with 3.77% vs 2.97% for IBTO. On fees, IBTO is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, FCBD has been the lower-risk option at 0.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, FCBD has performed better with a 3.77% return vs 2.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IBTO is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for FCBD.

FCBD has the higher dividend yield at 4.22%, compared with 4.15% for IBTO.

They also come from different issuers: Frontier and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for FCBD and 0.07% for IBTO.

FCBD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.62 vs 0.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FCBD and IBTO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer