PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FCAZX vs. TSAIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FCAZX vs. TSAIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Corefolio Allocation Fund (FCAZX) and TIAA-CREF Lifestyle Aggressive Growth Fund (TSAIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FCAZX vs. TSAIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FCAZX
Franklin Corefolio Allocation Fund
-8.24%14.61%16.27%25.65%-20.52%16.05%18.51%26.08%-6.87%19.10%
TSAIX
TIAA-CREF Lifestyle Aggressive Growth Fund
-5.91%20.04%15.46%22.72%-19.57%17.10%19.69%27.97%-11.27%22.35%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCAZX achieves a -8.24% return, which is significantly lower than TSAIX's -5.91% return. Over the past 10 years, FCAZX has underperformed TSAIX with an annualized return of 9.79%, while TSAIX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.54% annualized return.


FCAZX

1D
-0.35%
1M
-9.48%
YTD
-8.24%
6M
-6.62%
1Y
8.58%
3Y*
12.61%
5Y*
6.48%
10Y*
9.79%

TSAIX

1D
-0.38%
1M
-9.58%
YTD
-5.91%
6M
-3.06%
1Y
15.39%
3Y*
14.41%
5Y*
7.42%
10Y*
10.54%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FCAZX vs. TSAIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCAZX has a 0.16% expense ratio, which is higher than TSAIX's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

FCAZX vs. TSAIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCAZX
FCAZX Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
FCAZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCAZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCAZX Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
FCAZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCAZX Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

TSAIX
TSAIX Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
TSAIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSAIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSAIX Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
TSAIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSAIX Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCAZX vs. TSAIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Corefolio Allocation Fund (FCAZX) and TIAA-CREF Lifestyle Aggressive Growth Fund (TSAIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FCAZXTSAIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.51

0.92

-0.41

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.85

1.37

-0.51

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.20

-0.08

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.56

1.08

-0.52

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.29

4.80

-2.50

FCAZX vs. TSAIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCAZX Sharpe Ratio is 0.51, which is lower than the TSAIX Sharpe Ratio of 0.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCAZX and TSAIX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FCAZXTSAIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.51

0.92

-0.41

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

0.46

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

0.60

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.58

0.65

-0.08

Correlation

The correlation between FCAZX and TSAIX is 0.96, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

FCAZX vs. TSAIX - Dividend Comparison

FCAZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.19%, more than TSAIX's 7.84% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FCAZX
Franklin Corefolio Allocation Fund
8.19%7.51%7.25%4.44%8.39%3.94%7.30%8.49%6.14%3.09%4.63%5.17%
TSAIX
TIAA-CREF Lifestyle Aggressive Growth Fund
7.84%7.38%2.94%1.81%9.27%11.82%5.59%5.71%5.71%1.13%4.12%7.19%

Drawdowns

FCAZX vs. TSAIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCAZX drawdown since its inception was -32.73%, smaller than the maximum TSAIX drawdown of -34.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCAZX and TSAIX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FCAZXTSAIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.73%

-34.58%

+1.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.85%

-11.72%

-0.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.53%

-28.28%

-1.25%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.73%

-34.58%

+1.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.98%

-10.28%

-0.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.18%

-4.96%

-0.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.87%

2.77%

+0.10%

Volatility

FCAZX vs. TSAIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin Corefolio Allocation Fund (FCAZX) is 4.90%, while TIAA-CREF Lifestyle Aggressive Growth Fund (TSAIX) has a volatility of 5.29%. This indicates that FCAZX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TSAIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FCAZXTSAIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.90%

5.29%

-0.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.47%

9.81%

-0.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.21%

17.09%

+0.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.77%

16.15%

+0.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.78%

17.59%

-0.81%