FCAZX vs. TSAIX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

FCAZX (Franklin Corefolio Allocation Fund) and TSAIX (TIAA-CREF Lifestyle Aggressive Growth Fund) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Over the past 10 years, FCAZX returned 11.54%/yr vs 12.53%/yr for TSAIX. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. FCAZX charges 0.16%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for TSAIX.

Performance

FCAZX vs. TSAIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Corefolio Allocation Fund (FCAZX) and TIAA-CREF Lifestyle Aggressive Growth Fund (TSAIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCAZX achieves a 5.79% return, which is significantly lower than TSAIX's 10.46% return. Over the past 10 years, FCAZX has underperformed TSAIX with an annualized return of 11.54%, while TSAIX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.53% annualized return.

FCAZX

• 1D: -0.64%
• 1M: 0.92%
• YTD: 5.79%
• 6M: 4.92%
• 1Y: 15.79%
• 3Y*: 16.14%
• 5Y*: 7.97%
• 10Y*: 11.54%

TSAIX

• 1D: -0.04%
• 1M: 2.25%
• YTD: 10.46%
• 6M: 9.77%
• 1Y: 25.69%
• 3Y*: 18.90%
• 5Y*: 9.54%
• 10Y*: 12.53%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCAZX vs. TSAIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FCAZX Franklin Corefolio Allocation Fund	5.79%	14.61%	16.27%	25.65%	-20.52%	16.05%	18.51%	26.08%	-6.87%	19.10%
TSAIX TIAA-CREF Lifestyle Aggressive Growth Fund	10.46%	20.04%	15.46%	22.72%	-19.57%	17.10%	19.69%	27.97%	-11.27%	22.35%

Correlation

The correlation between FCAZX and TSAIX is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.97
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.97
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.97
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.96
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2013	0.96

The correlation between FCAZX and TSAIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FCAZX vs. TSAIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCAZX

FCAZX Risk / Return Rank: 24
FCAZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 24
FCAZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
FCAZX Omega Ratio Rank: 23
FCAZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 21
FCAZX Martin Ratio Rank: 30

TSAIX

TSAIX Risk / Return Rank: 53
TSAIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
TSAIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
TSAIX Omega Ratio Rank: 50
TSAIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 51
TSAIX Martin Ratio Rank: 60

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCAZX vs. TSAIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Corefolio Allocation Fund (FCAZX) and TIAA-CREF Lifestyle Aggressive Growth Fund (TSAIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FCAZX	TSAIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.27	1.97	-0.69
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.82	2.71	-0.89
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	1.36	-0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.53	2.62	-1.08
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.43	11.24	-4.81

FCAZX vs. TSAIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCAZX Sharpe Ratio is 1.27, which is lower than the TSAIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCAZX and TSAIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FCAZX vs. TSAIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCAZX drawdown since its inception was -32.73%, smaller than the maximum TSAIX drawdown of -34.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCAZX and TSAIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FCAZX	TSAIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-32.73%	-34.58%	+1.85%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.98%	-10.28%	-0.70%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.80%	-17.29%	-0.51%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.53%	-28.28%	-1.25%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-32.73%	-34.58%	+1.85%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.06%	-0.16%	-0.90%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.12%	-4.90%	-0.22%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.61%	2.38%	+0.23%

Volatility

FCAZX vs. TSAIX - Volatility Comparison

Franklin Corefolio Allocation Fund (FCAZX) and TIAA-CREF Lifestyle Aggressive Growth Fund (TSAIX) have volatilities of 5.09% and 5.28%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FCAZX	TSAIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.09%	5.28%	-0.19%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.80%	11.27%	-0.47%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.23%	13.71%	-0.48%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.97%	16.37%	+0.60%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.88%	17.70%	-0.82%

FCAZX vs. TSAIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCAZX has a 0.16% expense ratio, which is higher than TSAIX's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

FCAZX vs. TSAIX - Dividend Comparison

FCAZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.35%, more than TSAIX's 6.68% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FCAZX Franklin Corefolio Allocation Fund	13.35%	7.51%	7.25%	4.44%	8.39%	3.94%	7.30%	8.49%	6.14%	3.09%	4.63%	5.17%
TSAIX TIAA-CREF Lifestyle Aggressive Growth Fund	6.68%	7.38%	2.94%	1.81%	9.27%	11.82%	5.59%	5.71%	5.71%	1.13%	4.12%	7.19%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FCAZX and TSAIX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.97, FCAZX and TSAIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FCAZX or TSAIX?

TSAIX has higher volatility (5.28%) compared to FCAZX (5.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCAZX dropped -32.73% vs TSAIX's -34.58%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TSAIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.97 vs 1.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.