PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FCAGX vs. VSGAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FCAGX vs. VSGAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Growth Fund Class A (FCAGX) and Vanguard Small-Cap Growth Index Fund Admiral Shares (VSGAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FCAGX having a 17.83% return and VSGAX slightly lower at 17.46%. Over the past 10 years, FCAGX has outperformed VSGAX with an annualized return of 14.35%, while VSGAX has yielded a comparatively lower 11.73% annualized return.


FCAGX

1D
-0.53%
1M
1.31%
YTD
17.83%
6M
14.41%
1Y
36.74%
3Y*
20.27%
5Y*
7.76%
10Y*
14.35%

VSGAX

1D
-1.07%
1M
3.64%
YTD
17.46%
6M
15.68%
1Y
32.13%
3Y*
17.71%
5Y*
5.69%
10Y*
11.73%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCAGX vs. VSGAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FCAGX
Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Growth Fund Class A
17.83%10.88%20.21%18.72%-25.57%10.19%36.01%35.97%-4.85%28.62%
VSGAX
Vanguard Small-Cap Growth Index Fund Admiral Shares
17.46%8.44%14.94%23.04%-28.39%5.70%35.26%32.76%-5.69%21.92%

Correlation

The correlation between FCAGX and VSGAX is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 28, 2011

0.97

The correlation between FCAGX and VSGAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

FCAGX vs. VSGAX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FCAGX
VSGAX

Healthcare

27.9%
15.3%

Industrials

25.8%
24.7%

Technology

18.2%
25.9%

Consumer Cyclical

9.7%
9.6%

Financial Services

6.7%
5.6%

Energy

3.1%
4.8%

Consumer Defensive

3.1%
2.4%

Basic Materials

2.8%
3.2%

Communication Services

1.3%
3.5%

Real Estate

1.1%
3.9%

Utilities

0.5%
1.2%

Healthcare

FCAGX
27.9%
VSGAX
15.3%

Industrials

FCAGX
25.8%
VSGAX
24.7%

Technology

FCAGX
18.2%
VSGAX
25.9%

Consumer Cyclical

FCAGX
9.7%
VSGAX
9.6%

Financial Services

FCAGX
6.7%
VSGAX
5.6%

Energy

FCAGX
3.1%
VSGAX
4.8%

Consumer Defensive

FCAGX
3.1%
VSGAX
2.4%

Basic Materials

FCAGX
2.8%
VSGAX
3.2%

Communication Services

FCAGX
1.3%
VSGAX
3.5%

Real Estate

FCAGX
1.1%
VSGAX
3.9%

Utilities

FCAGX
0.5%
VSGAX
1.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FCAGX vs. VSGAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCAGX
FCAGX Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
FCAGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCAGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCAGX Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
FCAGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCAGX Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

VSGAX
VSGAX Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
VSGAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VSGAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
VSGAX Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
VSGAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
VSGAX Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCAGX vs. VSGAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Growth Fund Class A (FCAGX) and Vanguard Small-Cap Growth Index Fund Admiral Shares (VSGAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FCAGXVSGAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.29

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.81

2.89

-0.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.29

10.99

+0.30

FCAGX vs. VSGAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCAGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.75, which is comparable to the VSGAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCAGX and VSGAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FCAGXVSGAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.75

1.69

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

0.24

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

0.51

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

0.57

-0.08

Drawdowns

FCAGX vs. VSGAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCAGX drawdown since its inception was -61.19%, which is greater than VSGAX's maximum drawdown of -38.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCAGX and VSGAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FCAGXVSGAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.19%

-38.70%

-22.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.19%

-11.37%

-1.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.76%

-27.47%

-1.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.13%

-38.36%

-0.77%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.13%

-38.70%

-0.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.89%

-1.07%

+0.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.48%

-8.55%

-2.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.28%

2.98%

+0.30%

Volatility

FCAGX vs. VSGAX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Growth Fund Class A (FCAGX) has a higher volatility of 6.54% compared to Vanguard Small-Cap Growth Index Fund Admiral Shares (VSGAX) at 5.45%. This indicates that FCAGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VSGAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FCAGXVSGAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.54%

5.45%

+1.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.21%

14.84%

+1.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.23%

19.48%

+1.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.47%

23.56%

-0.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.84%

23.00%

-0.16%

FCAGX vs. VSGAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCAGX has a 1.29% expense ratio, which is higher than VSGAX's 0.07% expense ratio.


Dividends

FCAGX vs. VSGAX - Dividend Comparison

FCAGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.89%, more than VSGAX's 0.44% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FCAGX
Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Growth Fund Class A
5.89%6.94%1.20%0.00%0.00%20.36%8.58%5.58%14.80%7.05%0.79%4.32%
VSGAX
Vanguard Small-Cap Growth Index Fund Admiral Shares
0.44%0.54%0.54%0.67%0.55%0.36%0.44%0.57%0.79%0.81%1.08%0.98%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, FCAGX and VSGAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FCAGX has higher volatility (6.54%) compared to VSGAX (5.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCAGX dropped -61.19% vs VSGAX's -38.70%.

FCAGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.75 vs 1.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FCAGX and VSGAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer