PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FCAFX vs. JRLVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FCAFX vs. JRLVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Freedom Income Fund Class C (FCAFX) and John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2045 Lifetime Portfolio (JRLVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCAFX achieves a 4.11% return, which is significantly lower than JRLVX's 11.90% return. Over the past 10 years, FCAFX has underperformed JRLVX with an annualized return of 3.36%, while JRLVX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.27% annualized return.


FCAFX

1D
0.09%
1M
0.27%
YTD
4.11%
6M
4.35%
1Y
9.43%
3Y*
6.76%
5Y*
2.00%
10Y*
3.36%

JRLVX

1D
0.33%
1M
2.06%
YTD
11.90%
6M
12.35%
1Y
27.09%
3Y*
18.85%
5Y*
9.32%
10Y*
11.27%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCAFX vs. JRLVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FCAFX
Fidelity Advisor Freedom Income Fund Class C
4.11%9.01%3.20%7.08%-12.28%2.04%7.69%10.00%-2.63%6.38%
JRLVX
John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2045 Lifetime Portfolio
11.90%19.25%14.50%18.00%-18.06%18.45%16.23%25.03%-8.29%17.40%

Correlation

The correlation between FCAFX and JRLVX is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.74

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 11, 2013

0.74

The correlation between FCAFX and JRLVX shifts across timeframes, from 0.72 (5 years) to 0.82 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FCAFX vs. JRLVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCAFX
FCAFX Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
FCAFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCAFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCAFX Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
FCAFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCAFX Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

JRLVX
JRLVX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
JRLVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JRLVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
JRLVX Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
JRLVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
JRLVX Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCAFX vs. JRLVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Freedom Income Fund Class C (FCAFX) and John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2045 Lifetime Portfolio (JRLVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FCAFXJRLVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.44

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.42

3.17

-0.76

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.42

14.06

-3.65

FCAFX vs. JRLVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCAFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.04, which is comparable to the JRLVX Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCAFX and JRLVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FCAFXJRLVXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.04

2.39

-0.35

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

0.63

-0.26

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

0.71

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.64

0.65

-0.01

Drawdowns

FCAFX vs. JRLVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCAFX drawdown since its inception was -20.01%, smaller than the maximum JRLVX drawdown of -32.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCAFX and JRLVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FCAFXJRLVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.01%

-32.53%

+12.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.83%

-8.50%

+4.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.18%

-15.27%

+10.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.75%

-25.64%

+8.89%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-16.75%

-32.53%

+15.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.18%

-0.38%

+0.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.49%

-4.56%

+2.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.89%

1.91%

-1.02%

Volatility

FCAFX vs. JRLVX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Freedom Income Fund Class C (FCAFX) is 1.88%, while John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2045 Lifetime Portfolio (JRLVX) has a volatility of 3.33%. This indicates that FCAFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JRLVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FCAFXJRLVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.88%

3.33%

-1.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.86%

8.98%

-5.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.57%

11.29%

-6.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.37%

14.77%

-9.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.65%

15.98%

-11.33%

FCAFX vs. JRLVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCAFX has a 1.47% expense ratio, which is higher than JRLVX's 0.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

FCAFX vs. JRLVX - Dividend Comparison

FCAFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.07%, less than JRLVX's 3.18% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FCAFX
Fidelity Advisor Freedom Income Fund Class C
2.07%2.28%2.16%1.93%5.15%4.75%2.98%2.75%4.66%2.52%2.13%2.20%
JRLVX
John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2045 Lifetime Portfolio
3.18%3.55%1.89%2.24%8.03%6.00%4.26%8.99%10.96%4.29%3.40%1.90%

Frequently Asked Questions


FCAFX and JRLVX have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JRLVX has higher volatility (3.33%) compared to FCAFX (1.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCAFX dropped -20.01% vs JRLVX's -32.53%.

JRLVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 2.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FCAFX and JRLVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer