PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FBY vs. TSMY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FBY vs. TSMY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax META Option Income ETF (FBY) and YieldMax TSM Option Income Strategy ETF (TSMY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FBY achieves a -13.50% return, which is significantly lower than TSMY's 35.90% return.


FBY

1D
-0.06%
1M
-7.14%
YTD
-13.50%
6M
-13.67%
1Y
-17.63%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TSMY

1D
-5.90%
1M
5.93%
YTD
35.90%
6M
38.06%
1Y
82.45%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FBY vs. TSMY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
FBY
YieldMax META Option Income ETF
-13.50%1.98%15.48%
TSMY
YieldMax TSM Option Income Strategy ETF
35.90%41.00%8.05%

Correlation

The correlation between FBY and TSMY is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 21, 2024

0.42

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FBY vs. TSMY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FBY
FBY Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
FBY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FBY Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
FBY Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
FBY Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
FBY Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

TSMY
TSMY Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
TSMY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSMY Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSMY Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
TSMY Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSMY Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FBY vs. TSMY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax META Option Income ETF (FBY) and YieldMax TSM Option Income Strategy ETF (TSMY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FBYTSMYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.91

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.91

1.43

-0.52

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.60

5.35

-5.95

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.22

19.38

-20.61

FBY vs. TSMY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FBY Sharpe Ratio is -0.60, which is lower than the TSMY Sharpe Ratio of 2.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FBY and TSMY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FBY vs. TSMY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FBY drawdown since its inception was -31.53%, roughly equal to the maximum TSMY drawdown of -31.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBY and TSMY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FBYTSMYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.53%

-31.15%

-0.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-29.50%

-15.50%

-14.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-25.66%

-5.90%

-19.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.09%

-5.44%

-2.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.46%

4.27%

+10.19%

Volatility

FBY vs. TSMY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for YieldMax META Option Income ETF (FBY) is 10.24%, while YieldMax TSM Option Income Strategy ETF (TSMY) has a volatility of 13.61%. This indicates that FBY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TSMY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FBYTSMYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.24%

13.61%

-3.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.30%

25.03%

-1.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.60%

31.14%

-1.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.65%

33.94%

-5.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.65%

33.94%

-5.29%

FBY vs. TSMY - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both FBY and TSMY have an expense ratio of 0.99%.


Dividends

FBY vs. TSMY - Dividend Comparison

FBY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 57.98%, more than TSMY's 51.03% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
FBY
YieldMax META Option Income ETF
57.98%55.43%53.89%8.31%
TSMY
YieldMax TSM Option Income Strategy ETF
51.03%56.76%13.71%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FBY and TSMY have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TSMY has higher volatility (13.61%) compared to FBY (10.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FBY dropped -31.53% vs TSMY's -31.15%.

On 1-year performance, TSMY leads with 82.45% vs -17.63% for FBY. Both ETFs have the same 0.99% expense ratio. On volatility, FBY has been the lower-risk option at 10.24%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, TSMY has performed better with a 82.45% return vs -17.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FBY and TSMY have the same expense ratio: 0.99% per year.

FBY has the higher dividend yield at 57.98%, compared with 51.03% for TSMY.

TSMY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.66 vs -0.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FBY and TSMY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer