FBY vs. TSLY
FBY (YieldMax META Option Income ETF) and TSLY (YieldMax TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FBY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax, while TSLY is a Options Trading fund actively managed by YieldMax. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, FBY returned -10.52% vs 24.96% for TSLY. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.99% expense ratio.
Performance
FBY vs. TSLY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FBY achieves a -9.36% return, which is significantly lower than TSLY's -1.77% return.
FBY
- 1D
- -0.26%
- 1M
- -0.92%
- YTD
- -9.36%
- 6M
- -8.42%
- 1Y
- -10.52%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TSLY
- 1D
- 1.87%
- 1M
- 5.85%
- YTD
- -1.77%
- 6M
- 1.35%
- 1Y
- 24.96%
- 3Y*
- 15.12%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FBY vs. TSLY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
FBY YieldMax META Option Income ETF | -9.36% | 1.98% | 44.42% | 15.65% |
TSLY YieldMax TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF | -1.77% | 13.62% | 27.83% | -11.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between FBY and TSLY is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 31, 2023 | 0.36 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FBY vs. TSLY — Risk / Return Rank
FBY
TSLY
FBY vs. TSLY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax META Option Income ETF (FBY) and YieldMax TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF (TSLY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FBY | TSLY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.37 | 0.66 | -1.03 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.33 | 1.07 | -1.40 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.95 | 1.14 | -0.18 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.29 | 1.12 | -1.40 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.63 | 2.66 | -3.29 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FBY | TSLY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.37 | 0.66 | -1.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.58 | 0.30 | +0.28 |
Drawdowns
FBY vs. TSLY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FBY drawdown since its inception was -31.53%, smaller than the maximum TSLY drawdown of -49.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBY and TSLY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FBY | TSLY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.53% | -49.52% | +17.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.50% | -21.64% | -7.86% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -49.52% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -22.10% | -8.16% | -13.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.80% | -20.01% | +12.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.35% | 9.08% | +4.27% |
Volatility
FBY vs. TSLY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for YieldMax META Option Income ETF (FBY) is 6.15%, while YieldMax TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF (TSLY) has a volatility of 9.96%. This indicates that FBY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TSLY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FBY | TSLY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.15% | 9.96% | -3.81% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.94% | 22.38% | -0.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.73% | 38.19% | -9.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.46% | 45.53% | -17.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.46% | 45.53% | -17.07% |
FBY vs. TSLY - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both FBY and TSLY have an expense ratio of 0.99%.
Dividends
FBY vs. TSLY - Dividend Comparison
FBY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 57.90%, less than TSLY's 83.88% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
FBY YieldMax META Option Income ETF | 57.90% | 55.43% | 53.89% | 8.31% |
TSLY YieldMax TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF | 83.88% | 91.19% | 82.30% | 76.47% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FBY and TSLY have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TSLY has higher volatility (9.96%) compared to FBY (6.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FBY dropped -31.53% vs TSLY's -49.52%.
On 1-year performance, TSLY leads with 24.96% vs -10.52% for FBY. Both ETFs have the same 0.99% expense ratio. On volatility, FBY has been the lower-risk option at 6.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, TSLY has performed better with a 24.96% return vs -10.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FBY and TSLY have the same expense ratio: 0.99% per year.
TSLY has the higher dividend yield at 83.88%, compared with 57.90% for FBY.
FBY is categorized as Derivative Income, while TSLY is Options Trading.
TSLY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.66 vs -0.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FBY and TSLY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer