FBY vs. THTA
FBY (YieldMax META Option Income ETF) and THTA (SoFi Enhanced Yield ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, FBY returned -17.63% vs 16.54% for THTA. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FBY charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for THTA.
Performance
FBY vs. THTA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FBY achieves a -13.50% return, which is significantly lower than THTA's 7.57% return.
FBY
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- -7.14%
- YTD
- -13.50%
- 6M
- -13.67%
- 1Y
- -17.63%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
THTA
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- 0.77%
- YTD
- 7.57%
- 6M
- 8.24%
- 1Y
- 16.54%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FBY vs. THTA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
FBY YieldMax META Option Income ETF | -13.50% | 1.98% | 44.42% | 8.05% |
THTA SoFi Enhanced Yield ETF | 7.57% | -10.24% | 7.31% | 0.99% |
Correlation
The correlation between FBY and THTA is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 15, 2023 | 0.30 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FBY vs. THTA — Risk / Return Rank
FBY
THTA
FBY vs. THTA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax META Option Income ETF (FBY) and SoFi Enhanced Yield ETF (THTA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FBY | THTA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.50 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.97 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.91 | 1.77 | -0.86 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.60 | 6.30 | -6.90 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.22 | 52.38 | -53.61 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FBY vs. THTA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FBY drawdown since its inception was -31.53%, roughly equal to the maximum THTA drawdown of -31.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBY and THTA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FBY | THTA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.53% | -31.41% | -0.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.50% | -2.64% | -26.86% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -25.66% | -6.17% | -19.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.09% | -7.49% | -0.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.46% | 0.32% | +14.14% |
Volatility
FBY vs. THTA - Volatility Comparison
YieldMax META Option Income ETF (FBY) has a higher volatility of 10.24% compared to SoFi Enhanced Yield ETF (THTA) at 0.96%. This indicates that FBY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than THTA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FBY | THTA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.24% | 0.96% | +9.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.30% | 4.07% | +19.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.60% | 5.72% | +23.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.65% | 20.04% | +8.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.65% | 20.04% | +8.61% |
FBY vs. THTA - Expense Ratio Comparison
FBY has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than THTA's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
FBY vs. THTA - Dividend Comparison
FBY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 57.98%, more than THTA's 11.15% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
FBY YieldMax META Option Income ETF | 57.98% | 55.43% | 53.89% | 8.31% |
THTA SoFi Enhanced Yield ETF | 11.15% | 12.66% | 12.44% | 0.58% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FBY and THTA have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FBY has higher volatility (10.24%) compared to THTA (0.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FBY dropped -31.53% vs THTA's -31.41%.
On 1-year performance, THTA leads with 16.54% vs -17.63% for FBY. On fees, THTA is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, THTA has been the lower-risk option at 0.96%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, THTA has performed better with a 16.54% return vs -17.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
THTA is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for FBY.
FBY has the higher dividend yield at 57.98%, compared with 11.15% for THTA.
They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and SoFi. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for FBY and 0.49% for THTA.
THTA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.90 vs -0.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FBY and THTA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer