FBY vs. FYEE
FBY (YieldMax META Option Income ETF) and FYEE (Fidelity Yield Enhanced Equity ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, FBY returned -6.53% vs 24.64% for FYEE. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FBY charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.28%/yr for FYEE.
Performance
FBY vs. FYEE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FBY achieves a -5.84% return, which is significantly lower than FYEE's 7.03% return.
FBY
- 1D
- 3.88%
- 1M
- 2.31%
- YTD
- -5.84%
- 6M
- -4.65%
- 1Y
- -6.53%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FYEE
- 1D
- -0.30%
- 1M
- 3.22%
- YTD
- 7.03%
- 6M
- 8.52%
- 1Y
- 24.64%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FBY vs. FYEE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
FBY YieldMax META Option Income ETF | -5.84% | 1.98% | 14.67% |
FYEE Fidelity Yield Enhanced Equity ETF | 7.03% | 15.76% | 13.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between FBY and FYEE is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 12, 2024 | 0.54 |
The correlation between FBY and FYEE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.54 to 0.55 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FBY vs. FYEE — Risk / Return Rank
FBY
FYEE
FBY vs. FYEE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax META Option Income ETF (FBY) and Fidelity Yield Enhanced Equity ETF (FYEE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FBY | FYEE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.23 | 2.57 | -2.80 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.12 | 3.47 | -3.59 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 1.52 | -0.54 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.22 | 3.35 | -3.57 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.49 | 17.14 | -17.63 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FBY | FYEE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.23 | 2.57 | -2.80 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.64 | 1.24 | -0.61 |
Drawdowns
FBY vs. FYEE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FBY drawdown since its inception was -31.53%, which is greater than FYEE's maximum drawdown of -18.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBY and FYEE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FBY | FYEE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.53% | -18.79% | -12.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.50% | -7.39% | -22.11% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.08% | -0.30% | -18.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.82% | -2.25% | -5.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.41% | 1.44% | +11.97% |
Volatility
FBY vs. FYEE - Volatility Comparison
YieldMax META Option Income ETF (FBY) has a higher volatility of 7.24% compared to Fidelity Yield Enhanced Equity ETF (FYEE) at 1.43%. This indicates that FBY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FYEE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FBY | FYEE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.24% | 1.43% | +5.81% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.27% | 7.26% | +15.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.89% | 9.64% | +19.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.53% | 13.84% | +14.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.53% | 13.84% | +14.69% |
FBY vs. FYEE - Expense Ratio Comparison
FBY has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than FYEE's 0.28% expense ratio.
Dividends
FBY vs. FYEE - Dividend Comparison
FBY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 55.74%, more than FYEE's 7.57% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
FBY YieldMax META Option Income ETF | 55.74% | 55.43% | 53.89% | 8.31% |
FYEE Fidelity Yield Enhanced Equity ETF | 7.57% | 7.08% | 5.45% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FBY and FYEE have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FBY has higher volatility (7.24%) compared to FYEE (1.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FBY dropped -31.53% vs FYEE's -18.79%.
On 1-year performance, FYEE leads with 24.64% vs -6.53% for FBY. On fees, FYEE is cheaper at 0.28% per year. On volatility, FYEE has been the lower-risk option at 1.43%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, FYEE has performed better with a 24.64% return vs -6.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FYEE is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for FBY.
FBY has the higher dividend yield at 55.74%, compared with 7.57% for FYEE.
They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for FBY and 0.28% for FYEE.
FYEE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.57 vs -0.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FBY and FYEE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer