PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FBY vs. AIPI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FBY vs. AIPI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax META Option Income ETF (FBY) and REX AI Equity Premium Income ETF (AIPI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FBY achieves a -5.84% return, which is significantly lower than AIPI's 10.68% return.


FBY

1D
3.88%
1M
2.31%
YTD
-5.84%
6M
-4.65%
1Y
-6.53%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

AIPI

1D
-0.81%
1M
8.89%
YTD
10.68%
6M
10.16%
1Y
29.63%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FBY vs. AIPI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
FBY
YieldMax META Option Income ETF
-5.84%1.98%24.86%
AIPI
REX AI Equity Premium Income ETF
10.68%16.38%15.36%

Correlation

The correlation between FBY and AIPI is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2024

0.56

The correlation between FBY and AIPI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.52 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FBY vs. AIPI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FBY
FBY Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
FBY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FBY Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
FBY Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
FBY Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
FBY Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

AIPI
AIPI Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
AIPI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AIPI Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
AIPI Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
AIPI Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
AIPI Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FBY vs. AIPI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax META Option Income ETF (FBY) and REX AI Equity Premium Income ETF (AIPI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FBYAIPIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.57

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.98

1.34

-0.36

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.22

2.07

-2.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.49

6.42

-6.90

FBY vs. AIPI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FBY Sharpe Ratio is -0.23, which is lower than the AIPI Sharpe Ratio of 1.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FBY and AIPI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FBYAIPIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.23

1.87

-2.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.64

1.03

-0.40

Drawdowns

FBY vs. AIPI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FBY drawdown since its inception was -31.53%, which is greater than AIPI's maximum drawdown of -25.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBY and AIPI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FBYAIPIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.53%

-25.25%

-6.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-29.50%

-14.40%

-15.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-19.08%

-0.81%

-18.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.82%

-4.66%

-3.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.41%

4.63%

+8.78%

Volatility

FBY vs. AIPI - Volatility Comparison

YieldMax META Option Income ETF (FBY) has a higher volatility of 7.24% compared to REX AI Equity Premium Income ETF (AIPI) at 2.89%. This indicates that FBY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AIPI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FBYAIPIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.24%

2.89%

+4.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.27%

12.96%

+9.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.89%

15.94%

+12.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.53%

21.39%

+7.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.53%

21.39%

+7.14%

FBY vs. AIPI - Expense Ratio Comparison

FBY has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than AIPI's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

FBY vs. AIPI - Dividend Comparison

FBY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 55.74%, more than AIPI's 34.81% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
AIPI
REX AI Equity Premium Income ETF
34.81%37.84%18.13%0.00%
FBY
YieldMax META Option Income ETF
55.74%55.43%53.89%8.31%

Frequently Asked Questions


FBY and AIPI have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FBY has higher volatility (7.24%) compared to AIPI (2.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FBY dropped -31.53% vs AIPI's -25.25%.

On 1-year performance, AIPI leads with 29.63% vs -6.53% for FBY. On fees, AIPI is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, AIPI has been the lower-risk option at 2.89%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, AIPI has performed better with a 29.63% return vs -6.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AIPI is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for FBY.

FBY has the higher dividend yield at 55.74%, compared with 34.81% for AIPI.

They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and REX. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for FBY and 0.65% for AIPI.

AIPI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.87 vs -0.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FBY and AIPI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer