FBY vs. ADX
FBY (YieldMax META Option Income ETF) and ADX (Adams Diversified Equity Fund, Inc.) are both funds - FBY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax, while ADX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Adams Funds. Over the past year, FBY returned -10.52% vs 35.41% for ADX. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FBY charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for ADX.
Performance
FBY vs. ADX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FBY achieves a -9.36% return, which is significantly lower than ADX's 14.31% return.
FBY
- 1D
- -0.26%
- 1M
- -0.92%
- YTD
- -9.36%
- 6M
- -8.42%
- 1Y
- -10.52%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ADX
- 1D
- 0.23%
- 1M
- 6.22%
- YTD
- 14.31%
- 6M
- 15.96%
- 1Y
- 35.41%
- 3Y*
- 29.55%
- 5Y*
- 17.67%
- 10Y*
- 18.34%
FBY vs. ADX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
FBY YieldMax META Option Income ETF | -9.36% | 1.98% | 44.42% | 15.65% |
ADX Adams Diversified Equity Fund, Inc. | 14.31% | 26.03% | 28.31% | 8.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between FBY and ADX is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 31, 2023 | 0.51 |
The correlation between FBY and ADX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.44 to 0.51 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FBY vs. ADX — Risk / Return Rank
FBY
ADX
FBY vs. ADX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax META Option Income ETF (FBY) and Adams Diversified Equity Fund, Inc. (ADX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FBY | ADX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.37 | 2.58 | -2.95 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.33 | 3.61 | -3.94 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.95 | 1.45 | -0.49 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.29 | 3.53 | -3.82 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.63 | 18.83 | -19.47 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FBY | ADX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.37 | 2.58 | -2.95 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.03 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.02 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.58 | 0.10 | +0.48 |
Drawdowns
FBY vs. ADX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FBY drawdown since its inception was -31.53%, smaller than the maximum ADX drawdown of -71.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBY and ADX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FBY | ADX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.53% | -71.60% | +40.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.50% | -10.16% | -19.34% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -18.29% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.07% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -37.17% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -22.10% | 0.00% | -22.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.80% | -23.13% | +15.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.35% | 1.90% | +11.45% |
Volatility
FBY vs. ADX - Volatility Comparison
YieldMax META Option Income ETF (FBY) has a higher volatility of 6.15% compared to Adams Diversified Equity Fund, Inc. (ADX) at 3.75%. This indicates that FBY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ADX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FBY | ADX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.15% | 3.75% | +2.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.94% | 10.67% | +11.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.73% | 13.79% | +14.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.46% | 17.30% | +11.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.46% | 18.03% | +10.43% |
FBY vs. ADX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FBY has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than ADX's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
FBY vs. ADX - Dividend Comparison
FBY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 57.90%, more than ADX's 7.30% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ADX Adams Diversified Equity Fund, Inc. | 7.30% | 7.93% | 12.38% | 7.34% | 7.36% | 15.35% | 6.54% | 9.00% | 15.85% | 9.18% | 7.79% | 7.17% |
FBY YieldMax META Option Income ETF | 57.90% | 55.43% | 53.89% | 8.31% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FBY and ADX have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FBY has higher volatility (6.15%) compared to ADX (3.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FBY dropped -31.53% vs ADX's -71.60%.
ADX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.58 vs -0.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FBY and ADX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer