PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FBTU.L vs. XDNA.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FBTU.L vs. XDNA.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust NYSE Arca Biotechnology UCITS ETF Class A USD Accumulating (FBTU.L) and iShares Genomics Immunology and Healthcare Index ETF (XDNA.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

FBTU.L is traded in USD, while XDNA.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the XDNA.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FBTU.L achieves a 8.73% return, which is significantly lower than XDNA.TO's 13.12% return.


FBTU.L

1D
4.34%
1M
9.71%
YTD
8.73%
6M
6.95%
1Y
38.25%
3Y*
13.28%
5Y*
6.94%
10Y*

XDNA.TO

1D
3.66%
1M
0.52%
YTD
13.12%
6M
10.71%
1Y
43.96%
3Y*
7.44%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FBTU.L vs. XDNA.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
FBTU.L
First Trust NYSE Arca Biotechnology UCITS ETF Class A USD Accumulating
8.73%25.95%4.74%3.91%9.40%
XDNA.TO
iShares Genomics Immunology and Healthcare Index ETF
13.12%17.48%-2.80%-5.75%-17.94%

Correlation

The correlation between FBTU.L and XDNA.TO is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.48

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.39

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 4, 2022

0.39

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FBTU.L vs. XDNA.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FBTU.L
FBTU.L Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
FBTU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FBTU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
FBTU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
FBTU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
FBTU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

XDNA.TO
XDNA.TO Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
XDNA.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDNA.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDNA.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
XDNA.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDNA.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FBTU.L vs. XDNA.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust NYSE Arca Biotechnology UCITS ETF Class A USD Accumulating (FBTU.L) and iShares Genomics Immunology and Healthcare Index ETF (XDNA.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FBTU.LXDNA.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.31

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.66

4.33

-1.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.17

12.11

-4.94

FBTU.L vs. XDNA.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FBTU.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.79, which is comparable to the XDNA.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FBTU.L and XDNA.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FBTU.LXDNA.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.79

1.75

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.27

-0.00

+0.27

Drawdowns

FBTU.L vs. XDNA.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FBTU.L drawdown since its inception was -33.73%, smaller than the maximum XDNA.TO drawdown of -49.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBTU.L and XDNA.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FBTU.LXDNA.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.73%

-49.73%

+16.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.30%

-10.21%

-4.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.47%

-29.71%

+7.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-12.71%

+12.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.11%

-27.86%

+14.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.32%

3.64%

+1.68%

Volatility

FBTU.L vs. XDNA.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust NYSE Arca Biotechnology UCITS ETF Class A USD Accumulating (FBTU.L) is 7.25%, while iShares Genomics Immunology and Healthcare Index ETF (XDNA.TO) has a volatility of 7.76%. This indicates that FBTU.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XDNA.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FBTU.LXDNA.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.25%

7.76%

-0.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.34%

18.53%

-2.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.31%

25.18%

-3.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.91%

26.48%

-5.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.38%

26.48%

-5.10%

FBTU.L vs. XDNA.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

FBTU.L has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than XDNA.TO's 0.44% expense ratio.


Dividends

FBTU.L vs. XDNA.TO - Dividend Comparison

FBTU.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XDNA.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.38%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
FBTU.L
First Trust NYSE Arca Biotechnology UCITS ETF Class A USD Accumulating
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XDNA.TO
iShares Genomics Immunology and Healthcare Index ETF
0.38%0.43%0.32%0.25%0.32%

Frequently Asked Questions


FBTU.L and XDNA.TO have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XDNA.TO is cheaper at 0.44% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XDNA.TO is cheaper with a 0.44% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for FBTU.L.

They also come from different issuers: First Trust and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for FBTU.L and 0.44% for XDNA.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FBTU.L and XDNA.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer