FBTC vs. VITL
FBTC (Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund) is Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Fidelity Bitcoin Reference Rate, while VITL (Vital Farms, Inc.) is a stock. Over the past year, FBTC returned -39.41% vs -67.42% for VITL. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
FBTC vs. VITL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FBTC achieves a -27.63% return, which is significantly higher than VITL's -68.50% return.
FBTC
- 1D
- 5.17%
- 1M
- -20.97%
- YTD
- -27.63%
- 6M
- -30.29%
- 1Y
- -39.41%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VITL
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- 12.53%
- YTD
- -68.50%
- 6M
- -68.29%
- 1Y
- -67.42%
- 3Y*
- -10.77%
- 5Y*
- -15.28%
- 10Y*
- —
FBTC vs. VITL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
FBTC Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund | -27.63% | -6.56% | 99.56% |
VITL Vital Farms, Inc. | -68.50% | -15.26% | 150.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between FBTC and VITL is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2024 | 0.07 |
The correlation between FBTC and VITL shifts across timeframes, from -0.03 (1 year) to 0.07 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FBTC vs. VITL — Risk / Return Rank
FBTC
VITL
FBTC vs. VITL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund (FBTC) and Vital Farms, Inc. (VITL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FBTC | VITL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.82 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.86 | 0.76 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.76 | -0.80 | +0.04 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.36 | -1.43 | +0.07 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FBTC | VITL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.90 | -1.10 | +0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.28 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.27 | -0.36 | +0.63 |
Drawdowns
FBTC vs. VITL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FBTC drawdown since its inception was -52.07%, smaller than the maximum VITL drawdown of -84.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBTC and VITL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FBTC | VITL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.07% | -84.20% | +32.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -52.07% | -84.20% | +32.13% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -84.20% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -84.20% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -49.59% | -80.81% | +31.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.18% | -47.28% | +31.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 28.93% | 47.12% | -18.19% |
Volatility
FBTC vs. VITL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund (FBTC) is 11.77%, while Vital Farms, Inc. (VITL) has a volatility of 18.45%. This indicates that FBTC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VITL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FBTC | VITL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.77% | 18.45% | -6.68% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 34.55% | 48.11% | -13.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 44.17% | 61.49% | -17.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 50.26% | 54.16% | -3.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 50.26% | 53.74% | -3.48% |
Dividends
FBTC vs. VITL - Dividend Comparison
Neither FBTC nor VITL has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
FBTC and VITL have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VITL has higher volatility (18.45%) compared to FBTC (11.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FBTC dropped -52.07% vs VITL's -84.20%.
FBTC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.90 vs -1.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FBTC and VITL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer