FBTC vs. ILS

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

FBTC (Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund) and ILS (Brookmont Catastrophic Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FBTC is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Fidelity Bitcoin Reference Rate, while ILS is a Nontraditional Bonds fund actively managed by Brookmont. FBTC is passively managed, while ILS is actively managed. Over the past year, FBTC returned -43.65% vs 7.79% for ILS. Their -0.12 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. FBTC charges 0.25%/yr vs 1.58%/yr for ILS.

Performance

FBTC vs. ILS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund (FBTC) and Brookmont Catastrophic Bond ETF (ILS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FBTC achieves a -27.08% return, which is significantly lower than ILS's 3.55% return.

FBTC

• 1D: 1.61%
• 1M: 3.87%
• 6M: -18.12%
• YTD: -27.08%
• 1Y: -43.65%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 11.58%

ILS

• 1D: 0.05%
• 1M: 0.99%
• 6M: 3.01%
• YTD: 3.55%
• 1Y: 7.79%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 5.34%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FBTC Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund	$185.12M	$202.75M	$237.85M
ILS Brookmont Catastrophic Bond ETF	$404.25K	$506.70K	$656.18K

FBTC vs. ILS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
FBTC Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund	-27.08%	5.92%
ILS Brookmont Catastrophic Bond ETF	3.55%	3.54%

Correlation

The correlation between FBTC and ILS is -0.10, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	-0.10
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 2025	-0.12

Return for Risk

FBTC vs. ILS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FBTC

FBTC Risk / Return Rank: 2
FBTC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
FBTC Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
FBTC Omega Ratio Rank: 2
FBTC Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
FBTC Martin Ratio Rank: 3

ILS

ILS Risk / Return Rank: 97
ILS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
ILS Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
ILS Omega Ratio Rank: 97
ILS Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
ILS Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FBTC vs. ILS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund (FBTC) and Brookmont Catastrophic Bond ETF (ILS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FBTC	ILS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.99	3.17	-4.16
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.45	5.29	-6.73
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.84	1.74	-0.90
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.82	14.14	-14.96
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.26	53.05	-54.30

FBTC vs. ILS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FBTC Sharpe Ratio is -0.99, which is lower than the ILS Sharpe Ratio of 3.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FBTC and ILS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FBTC vs. ILS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FBTC drawdown since its inception was -53.35%, which is greater than ILS's maximum drawdown of -2.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBTC and ILS.

Drawdown Indicators

	FBTC	ILS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-53.35%	-2.46%	-50.89%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-53.35%	-0.55%	-52.80%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-49.21%	0.00%	-49.21%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-18.22%	-0.50%	-17.72%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	34.76%	0.15%	+34.61%

Volatility

FBTC vs. ILS - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund (FBTC) has a higher volatility of 8.89% compared to Brookmont Catastrophic Bond ETF (ILS) at 0.42%. This indicates that FBTC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ILS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FBTC	ILS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.89%	0.42%	+8.47%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	33.75%	1.47%	+32.28%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	44.38%	2.47%	+41.91%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	49.44%	3.64%	+45.80%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	49.44%	3.64%	+45.80%

FBTC vs. ILS - Expense Ratio Comparison

FBTC has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than ILS's 1.58% expense ratio.

Dividends

FBTC vs. ILS - Dividend Comparison

FBTC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ILS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.13%.

Position	TTM	2025
FBTC Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund	0.00%	0.00%
ILS Brookmont Catastrophic Bond ETF	8.13%	6.06%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FBTC and ILS in my portfolio?

FBTC and ILS have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FBTC or ILS?

FBTC has higher volatility (8.89%) compared to ILS (0.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FBTC dropped -53.35% vs ILS's -2.46%.

Which ETF is better, FBTC or ILS?

On 1-year performance, ILS leads with 7.79% vs -43.65% for FBTC. On fees, FBTC is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, ILS has been the lower-risk option at 0.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FBTC or ILS?

Over the 1-year period, ILS has performed better with a 7.79% return vs -43.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FBTC or ILS?

FBTC is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 1.58% for ILS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FBTC or ILS?

ILS has the higher dividend yield at 8.13%, compared with 0.00% for FBTC.

What is the main difference between FBTC and ILS?

FBTC is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while ILS is Nontraditional Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Brookmont. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for FBTC and 1.58% for ILS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ILS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.17 vs -0.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.