FBTC vs. FBCG

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Trust (FBTC) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF (FBCG).

FBTC and FBCG are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FBTC is a passively managed fund by Fidelity that tracks the performance of the CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant. It was launched on Jan 11, 2024. FBCG is an actively managed fund by Fidelity. It was launched on Jun 3, 2020.

Performance

FBTC vs. FBCG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Trust (FBTC) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF (FBCG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

FBTC vs. FBCG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
FBTC Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Trust	-22.56%	-6.56%	99.56%
FBCG Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF	-8.61%	18.60%	37.44%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FBTC achieves a -22.56% return, which is significantly lower than FBCG's -8.61% return.

FBTC

• 1D: 1.97%
• 1M: 3.29%
• YTD: -22.56%
• 6M: -40.86%
• 1Y: -17.98%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FBCG

• 1D: 4.81%
• 1M: -5.43%
• YTD: -8.61%
• 6M: -6.56%
• 1Y: 25.45%
• 3Y*: 25.41%
• 5Y*: 10.98%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FBTC vs. FBCG - Expense Ratio Comparison

FBTC has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than FBCG's 0.59% expense ratio.

FBCG

Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF

FBTC

Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Trust

Return for Risk

FBTC vs. FBCG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FBTC

FBTC Risk / Return Rank: 6
FBTC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
FBTC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
FBTC Omega Ratio Rank: 6
FBTC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
FBTC Martin Ratio Rank: 6

FBCG

FBCG Risk / Return Rank: 64
FBCG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
FBCG Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
FBCG Omega Ratio Rank: 62
FBCG Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
FBCG Martin Ratio Rank: 64

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FBTC vs. FBCG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Trust (FBTC) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF (FBCG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FBTC	FBCG	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.40	0.97	-1.37
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.29	1.54	-1.83
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.97	1.22	-0.25
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.39	1.65	-2.04
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.84	5.92	-6.75
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FBTC vs. FBCG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FBTC Sharpe Ratio is -0.40, which is lower than the FBCG Sharpe Ratio of 0.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FBTC and FBCG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FBTC	FBCG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.40	0.97	-1.37
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.43	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.35	0.67	-0.31

Correlation

The correlation between FBTC and FBCG is 0.40, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

FBTC vs. FBCG - Dividend Comparison

FBTC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FBCG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.05%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
FBTC Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Trust	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FBCG Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF	0.05%	0.05%	0.12%	0.02%	0.00%	0.00%	0.01%

Drawdowns

FBTC vs. FBCG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FBTC drawdown since its inception was -49.33%, which is greater than FBCG's maximum drawdown of -43.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBTC and FBCG.

Drawdown Indicators

	FBTC	FBCG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-49.33%	-43.56%	-5.77%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-49.33%	-15.17%	-34.16%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-43.56%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-46.06%	-11.09%	-34.97%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.12%	-11.79%	-2.33%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	23.05%	4.23%	+18.82%

Volatility

FBTC vs. FBCG - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Trust (FBTC) has a higher volatility of 12.97% compared to Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF (FBCG) at 8.22%. This indicates that FBTC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FBCG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FBTC	FBCG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.97%	8.22%	+4.75%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	36.77%	14.74%	+22.03%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	45.30%	26.28%	+19.02%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	51.21%	25.82%	+25.39%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	51.21%	25.92%	+25.29%