FBTC.TO vs. ZGD.TO

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

FBTC.TO (Fidelity Advantage Bitcoin ETF) and ZGD.TO (BMO Equal Weight Global Gold Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FBTC.TO is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by Fidelity, while ZGD.TO is a Gold fund tracking the Solactive Equal Weight Global Gold Index. FBTC.TO is actively managed, while ZGD.TO is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, FBTC.TO returned 35.95%/yr vs 57.12%/yr for ZGD.TO. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FBTC.TO charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for ZGD.TO.

Performance

FBTC.TO vs. ZGD.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Fidelity Advantage Bitcoin ETF (FBTC.TO) and BMO Equal Weight Global Gold Index ETF (ZGD.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FBTC.TO achieves a -26.46% return, which is significantly lower than ZGD.TO's 7.53% return.

FBTC.TO

• 1D: -2.74%
• 1M: -20.46%
• YTD: -26.46%
• 6M: -32.03%
• 1Y: -38.60%
• 3Y*: 35.95%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ZGD.TO

• 1D: 1.20%
• 1M: 3.43%
• YTD: 7.53%
• 6M: 13.94%
• 1Y: 84.61%
• 3Y*: 57.12%
• 5Y*: 30.91%
• 10Y*: 18.24%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FBTC.TO vs. ZGD.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
FBTC.TO Fidelity Advantage Bitcoin ETF	-26.46%	-10.85%	137.16%	145.80%	-61.34%	-20.88%
ZGD.TO BMO Equal Weight Global Gold Index ETF	7.53%	170.64%	37.48%	10.17%	-2.30%	4.68%

Correlation

The correlation between FBTC.TO and ZGD.TO is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.15
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.06
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2021	0.10

Return for Risk

FBTC.TO vs. ZGD.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FBTC.TO

FBTC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 2
FBTC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
FBTC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
FBTC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 2
FBTC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
FBTC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 2

ZGD.TO

ZGD.TO Risk / Return Rank: 52
ZGD.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
ZGD.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
ZGD.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 52
ZGD.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
ZGD.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 47

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FBTC.TO vs. ZGD.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advantage Bitcoin ETF (FBTC.TO) and BMO Equal Weight Global Gold Index ETF (ZGD.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FBTC.TO	ZGD.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.90	1.89	-2.79
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.26	2.21	-3.47
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.86	1.32	-0.46
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.77	2.82	-3.59
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.32	7.62	-8.93
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FBTC.TO vs. ZGD.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FBTC.TO Sharpe Ratio is -0.90, which is lower than the ZGD.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FBTC.TO and ZGD.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FBTC.TO	ZGD.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.90	1.89	-2.79
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.85	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.49	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.07	0.29	-0.22

Drawdowns

FBTC.TO vs. ZGD.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FBTC.TO drawdown since its inception was -70.77%, which is greater than ZGD.TO's maximum drawdown of -60.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBTC.TO and ZGD.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	FBTC.TO	ZGD.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-70.77%	-60.12%	-10.65%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-50.22%	-30.15%	-20.07%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-50.22%	-30.15%	-20.07%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-42.75%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-51.72%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-49.79%	-21.82%	-27.97%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-30.95%	-28.33%	-2.62%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	29.35%	11.15%	+18.20%

Volatility

FBTC.TO vs. ZGD.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Advantage Bitcoin ETF (FBTC.TO) is 9.51%, while BMO Equal Weight Global Gold Index ETF (ZGD.TO) has a volatility of 15.73%. This indicates that FBTC.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ZGD.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FBTC.TO	ZGD.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.51%	15.73%	-6.22%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	33.11%	36.41%	-3.30%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	42.86%	45.12%	-2.26%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	52.36%	36.41%	+15.95%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	52.36%	37.35%	+15.01%

FBTC.TO vs. ZGD.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

FBTC.TO has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than ZGD.TO's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

FBTC.TO vs. ZGD.TO - Dividend Comparison

FBTC.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ZGD.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.20%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FBTC.TO Fidelity Advantage Bitcoin ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
ZGD.TO BMO Equal Weight Global Gold Index ETF	0.20%	0.22%	0.59%	0.76%	0.77%	0.38%	0.16%	1.20%	0.00%	0.00%	0.32%	0.46%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FBTC.TO and ZGD.TO in my portfolio?

FBTC.TO and ZGD.TO have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, FBTC.TO or ZGD.TO?

On fees, FBTC.TO is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, FBTC.TO or ZGD.TO?

FBTC.TO is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for ZGD.TO.

What is the main difference between FBTC.TO and ZGD.TO?

FBTC.TO is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while ZGD.TO is Gold. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and BMO. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for FBTC.TO and 0.60% for ZGD.TO.