PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FBTC.TO vs. FEQT.NEO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FBTC.TO vs. FEQT.NEO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Fidelity Advantage Bitcoin ETF (FBTC.TO) and Fidelity All-in-One Equity ETF Fund (FEQT.NEO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FBTC.TO achieves a -24.39% return, which is significantly lower than FEQT.NEO's 10.30% return.


FBTC.TO

1D
-2.22%
1M
-16.83%
YTD
-24.39%
6M
-30.03%
1Y
-37.95%
3Y*
34.59%
5Y*
10Y*

FEQT.NEO

1D
-0.38%
1M
4.01%
YTD
10.30%
6M
10.63%
1Y
24.74%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FBTC.TO vs. FEQT.NEO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
FBTC.TO
Fidelity Advantage Bitcoin ETF
-24.39%-10.85%54.83%
FEQT.NEO
Fidelity All-in-One Equity ETF Fund
10.30%19.42%14.08%

Correlation

The correlation between FBTC.TO and FEQT.NEO is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.43

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 14, 2024

0.43

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FBTC.TO vs. FEQT.NEO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FBTC.TO
FBTC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
FBTC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FBTC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
FBTC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
FBTC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
FBTC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

FEQT.NEO
FEQT.NEO Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
FEQT.NEO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FEQT.NEO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
FEQT.NEO Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
FEQT.NEO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
FEQT.NEO Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FBTC.TO vs. FEQT.NEO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advantage Bitcoin ETF (FBTC.TO) and Fidelity All-in-One Equity ETF Fund (FEQT.NEO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FBTC.TOFEQT.NEODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.86

1.42

-0.56

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.76

2.99

-3.75

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.30

12.96

-14.26

FBTC.TO vs. FEQT.NEO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FBTC.TO Sharpe Ratio is -0.89, which is lower than the FEQT.NEO Sharpe Ratio of 2.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FBTC.TO and FEQT.NEO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FBTC.TOFEQT.NEODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.89

2.26

-3.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.08

1.77

-1.69

Drawdowns

FBTC.TO vs. FEQT.NEO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FBTC.TO drawdown since its inception was -70.77%, which is greater than FEQT.NEO's maximum drawdown of -13.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBTC.TO and FEQT.NEO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FBTC.TOFEQT.NEODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-70.77%

-13.24%

-57.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-50.22%

-8.31%

-41.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-50.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-48.38%

-1.02%

-47.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-30.94%

-1.45%

-29.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

29.18%

1.91%

+27.27%

Volatility

FBTC.TO vs. FEQT.NEO - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advantage Bitcoin ETF (FBTC.TO) has a higher volatility of 9.72% compared to Fidelity All-in-One Equity ETF Fund (FEQT.NEO) at 3.89%. This indicates that FBTC.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FEQT.NEO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FBTC.TOFEQT.NEODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.72%

3.89%

+5.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

33.63%

8.88%

+24.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

42.84%

11.01%

+31.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

52.37%

12.45%

+39.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

52.37%

12.45%

+39.92%

FBTC.TO vs. FEQT.NEO - Expense Ratio Comparison

FBTC.TO has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than FEQT.NEO's 0.43% expense ratio.


Dividends

FBTC.TO vs. FEQT.NEO - Dividend Comparison

FBTC.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FEQT.NEO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.82%.


PositionTTM20252024
FBTC.TO
Fidelity Advantage Bitcoin ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%
FEQT.NEO
Fidelity All-in-One Equity ETF Fund
0.82%0.91%0.91%

Frequently Asked Questions


FBTC.TO and FEQT.NEO have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FBTC.TO is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FBTC.TO is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.43% for FEQT.NEO.

FBTC.TO is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while FEQT.NEO is Diversified Portfolio. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for FBTC.TO and 0.43% for FEQT.NEO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FBTC.TO and FEQT.NEO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer