PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FBSOX vs. FSTCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FBSOX vs. FSTCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Select IT Services Portfolio (FBSOX) and Fidelity Select Telecommunications Portfolio (FSTCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FBSOX achieves a -2.26% return, which is significantly lower than FSTCX's 22.50% return. Over the past 10 years, FBSOX has outperformed FSTCX with an annualized return of 9.27%, while FSTCX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.99% annualized return.


FBSOX

1D
4.31%
1M
12.34%
YTD
-2.26%
6M
-6.49%
1Y
-15.09%
3Y*
5.09%
5Y*
-2.57%
10Y*
9.27%

FSTCX

1D
-1.33%
1M
3.48%
YTD
22.50%
6M
23.09%
1Y
30.28%
3Y*
24.01%
5Y*
5.98%
10Y*
7.99%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FBSOX vs. FSTCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FBSOX
Fidelity Select IT Services Portfolio
-2.26%-9.19%15.04%23.23%-28.86%2.53%31.47%42.25%4.11%34.28%
FSTCX
Fidelity Select Telecommunications Portfolio
22.50%11.63%21.18%7.29%-16.99%-2.69%20.63%20.43%-8.03%1.44%

Correlation

The correlation between FBSOX and FSTCX is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.34

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 5, 1998

0.66

Over the past year, the correlation between FBSOX and FSTCX has dropped to 0.27 - well below their long-term average of 0.66, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FBSOX vs. FSTCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FBSOX
FBSOX Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
FBSOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FBSOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
FBSOX Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
FBSOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
FBSOX Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank

FSTCX
FSTCX Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
FSTCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSTCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSTCX Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
FSTCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSTCX Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FBSOX vs. FSTCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Select IT Services Portfolio (FBSOX) and Fidelity Select Telecommunications Portfolio (FSTCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FBSOXFSTCXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.68

1.87

-2.56

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.80

2.69

-3.48

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.90

1.31

-0.41

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.44

3.80

-4.24

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.83

11.20

-12.03

FBSOX vs. FSTCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FBSOX Sharpe Ratio is -0.68, which is lower than the FSTCX Sharpe Ratio of 1.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FBSOX and FSTCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FBSOXFSTCXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.68

1.87

-2.56

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.11

0.34

-0.45

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.41

0.45

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

0.46

+0.04

Drawdowns

FBSOX vs. FSTCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FBSOX drawdown since its inception was -50.01%, smaller than the maximum FSTCX drawdown of -82.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBSOX and FSTCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FBSOXFSTCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.01%

-82.81%

+32.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-32.78%

-8.24%

-24.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-35.31%

-11.00%

-24.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.28%

-33.14%

-9.14%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.28%

-34.08%

-8.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-20.42%

-2.20%

-18.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.19%

-24.65%

+14.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

17.28%

2.80%

+14.48%

Volatility

FBSOX vs. FSTCX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Select IT Services Portfolio (FBSOX) has a higher volatility of 6.75% compared to Fidelity Select Telecommunications Portfolio (FSTCX) at 5.21%. This indicates that FBSOX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSTCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FBSOXFSTCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.75%

5.21%

+1.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.60%

13.05%

+5.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.16%

16.49%

+5.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.58%

17.69%

+4.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.86%

17.99%

+4.87%

FBSOX vs. FSTCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FBSOX has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than FSTCX's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

FBSOX vs. FSTCX - Dividend Comparison

FBSOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.30%, more than FSTCX's 2.39% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FBSOX
Fidelity Select IT Services Portfolio
9.30%14.07%18.34%3.81%14.40%15.64%5.27%2.30%4.97%3.10%0.32%3.87%
FSTCX
Fidelity Select Telecommunications Portfolio
2.39%2.57%2.19%3.72%8.13%15.37%8.11%3.33%3.23%19.90%6.40%1.99%

Frequently Asked Questions


FBSOX and FSTCX have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FBSOX has higher volatility (6.75%) compared to FSTCX (5.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FBSOX dropped -50.01% vs FSTCX's -82.81%.

FSTCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.87 vs -0.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FBSOX and FSTCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer