FBSOX vs. FBGRX

In the year-to-date period, FBSOX achieves a -12.06% return, which is significantly lower than FBGRX's -10.52% return. Over the past 10 years, FBSOX has underperformed FBGRX with an annualized return of 9.90%, while FBGRX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.51% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

FBSOX has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than FBGRX's 0.79% expense ratio.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Select IT Services Portfolio (FBSOX) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current FBSOX Sharpe Ratio is 0.21, which is comparable to the FBGRX Sharpe Ratio of 0.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FBSOX and FBGRX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

FBSOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.10%, less than FBGRX's 0.26% yield.

The maximum FBSOX drawdown since its inception was -49.59%, smaller than the maximum FBGRX drawdown of -57.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBSOX and FBGRX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Fidelity Select IT Services Portfolio (FBSOX) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX) have volatilities of 16.86% and 16.32%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.