FBOT vs. FDCF

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FBOT (Fidelity Disruptive Automation ETF) and FDCF (Fidelity Disruptive Communications ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FBOT is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Fidelity, while FDCF is a Communications Equities fund actively managed by Fidelity. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, FBOT returned 39.88% vs 23.52% for FDCF. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.50% expense ratio.

Performance

FBOT vs. FDCF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Disruptive Automation ETF (FBOT) and Fidelity Disruptive Communications ETF (FDCF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FBOT achieves a 20.06% return, which is significantly higher than FDCF's 5.62% return.

FBOT

• 1D: -0.34%
• 1M: 5.52%
• YTD: 20.06%
• 6M: 21.90%
• 1Y: 39.88%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FDCF

• 1D: -1.77%
• 1M: 3.38%
• YTD: 5.62%
• 6M: 7.71%
• 1Y: 23.52%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FBOT vs. FDCF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
FBOT Fidelity Disruptive Automation ETF	20.06%	19.15%	12.58%	-1.03%
FDCF Fidelity Disruptive Communications ETF	5.62%	27.42%	28.37%	16.39%

Correlation

The correlation between FBOT and FDCF is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.73
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2023	0.79

The correlation between FBOT and FDCF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

FBOT vs. FDCF - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FBOT	FDCF
Industrials	51.0%	1.4%
Technology	37.5%	36.5%
Consumer Cyclical	6.3%	11.9%
Communication Services	4.2%	50.2%
Healthcare	0.9%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

FBOT vs. FDCF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FBOT

FBOT Risk / Return Rank: 56
FBOT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
FBOT Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
FBOT Omega Ratio Rank: 54
FBOT Calmar Ratio Rank: 53
FBOT Martin Ratio Rank: 59

FDCF

FDCF Risk / Return Rank: 31
FDCF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 35
FDCF Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
FDCF Omega Ratio Rank: 34
FDCF Calmar Ratio Rank: 27
FDCF Martin Ratio Rank: 28

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FBOT vs. FDCF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Disruptive Automation ETF (FBOT) and Fidelity Disruptive Communications ETF (FDCF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FBOT	FDCF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.98	1.29	+0.69
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.70	1.79	+0.91
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.23	+0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.64	1.31	+1.34
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.50	3.95	+6.55
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FBOT vs. FDCF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FBOT Sharpe Ratio is 1.98, which is higher than the FDCF Sharpe Ratio of 1.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FBOT and FDCF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FBOT	FDCF	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.98	1.29	+0.69
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.81	1.29	-0.48

Drawdowns

FBOT vs. FDCF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FBOT drawdown since its inception was -23.61%, roughly equal to the maximum FDCF drawdown of -22.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBOT and FDCF.

Drawdown Indicators

	FBOT	FDCF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.61%	-22.53%	-1.08%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.17%	-18.10%	+2.93%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.34%	-1.90%	+1.56%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.15%	-4.17%	-0.98%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.81%	5.97%	-2.16%

Volatility

FBOT vs. FDCF - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Disruptive Automation ETF (FBOT) has a higher volatility of 5.59% compared to Fidelity Disruptive Communications ETF (FDCF) at 4.28%. This indicates that FBOT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FDCF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FBOT	FDCF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.59%	4.28%	+1.31%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.00%	13.98%	+2.02%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.25%	18.36%	+1.89%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.95%	20.58%	+0.37%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.95%	20.58%	+0.37%

FBOT vs. FDCF - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both FBOT and FDCF have an expense ratio of 0.50%.

Dividends

FBOT vs. FDCF - Dividend Comparison

FBOT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.59%, more than FDCF's 0.03% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
FBOT Fidelity Disruptive Automation ETF	0.59%	0.81%	0.31%	0.20%
FDCF Fidelity Disruptive Communications ETF	0.03%	0.09%	0.25%	0.19%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FBOT and FDCF in my portfolio?

FBOT and FDCF have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FBOT or FDCF?

FBOT has higher volatility (5.59%) compared to FDCF (4.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FBOT dropped -23.61% vs FDCF's -22.53%.

Which ETF is better, FBOT or FDCF?

On 1-year performance, FBOT leads with 39.88% vs 23.52% for FDCF. Both ETFs have the same 0.50% expense ratio. On volatility, FDCF has been the lower-risk option at 4.28%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FBOT or FDCF?

Over the 1-year period, FBOT has performed better with a 39.88% return vs 23.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FBOT or FDCF?

FBOT and FDCF have the same expense ratio: 0.50% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FBOT or FDCF?

FBOT has the higher dividend yield at 0.59%, compared with 0.03% for FDCF.

What is the main difference between FBOT and FDCF?

FBOT is categorized as Technology Equities, while FDCF is Communications Equities.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FBOT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.98 vs 1.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.