FBNDX vs. EVTR

Last updated Aug 5, 2026

FBNDX (Fidelity Investment Grade Bond Fund) and EVTR (Eaton Vance Total Return Bond ETF) are both funds - FBNDX is a Intermediate Core Bond fund actively managed by Fidelity, while EVTR is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund actively managed by Eaton Vance. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, FBNDX returned 1.47% vs 3.04% for EVTR. Their correlation of 0.89 means they have usually moved in the same direction. FBNDX charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.32%/yr for EVTR.

Performance

FBNDX vs. EVTR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Investment Grade Bond Fund (FBNDX) and Eaton Vance Total Return Bond ETF (EVTR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FBNDX achieves a -0.73% return, which is significantly lower than EVTR's 0.30% return.

FBNDX

• 1D: 0.28%
• 1M: -1.25%
• 6M: -0.77%
• YTD: -0.73%
• 1Y: 1.47%
• 3Y*: 3.89%
• 5Y*: -0.54%
• 10Y*: 1.81%
• ALL TIME*: 2.73%

EVTR

• 1D: 0.48%
• 1M: -0.53%
• 6M: -0.03%
• YTD: 0.30%
• 1Y: 3.04%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 5.23%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
EVTR Eaton Vance Total Return Bond ETF	$25.75M	$23.10M	$25.82M
FBNDX Fidelity Investment Grade Bond Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

FBNDX vs. EVTR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
FBNDX Fidelity Investment Grade Bond Fund	-0.73%	7.37%	1.83%
EVTR Eaton Vance Total Return Bond ETF	0.30%	8.10%	4.03%

Correlation

The correlation between FBNDX and EVTR is 0.87, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.87
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 25, 2024	0.89

The correlation between FBNDX and EVTR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FBNDX vs. EVTR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FBNDX

FBNDX Risk / Return Rank: 9
FBNDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
FBNDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9
FBNDX Omega Ratio Rank: 8
FBNDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
FBNDX Martin Ratio Rank: 9

EVTR

EVTR Risk / Return Rank: 29
EVTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 30
EVTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 29
EVTR Omega Ratio Rank: 27
EVTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 30
EVTR Martin Ratio Rank: 30

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FBNDX vs. EVTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Investment Grade Bond Fund (FBNDX) and Eaton Vance Total Return Bond ETF (EVTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FBNDX	EVTR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.42	0.82	-0.40
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.62	1.19	-0.57
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.07	1.14	-0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.54	1.07	-0.53
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.30	2.86	-1.55

FBNDX vs. EVTR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FBNDX Sharpe Ratio is 0.42, which is lower than the EVTR Sharpe Ratio of 0.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FBNDX and EVTR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FBNDX vs. EVTR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FBNDX drawdown since its inception was -42.76%, which is greater than EVTR's maximum drawdown of -4.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBNDX and EVTR.

Drawdown Indicators

	FBNDX	EVTR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-42.76%	-4.08%	-38.68%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.02%	-2.86%	-0.16%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-5.06%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.65%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-18.74%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.67%	-1.44%	-1.23%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.32%	-1.00%	-9.32%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.24%	1.07%	+0.17%

Volatility

FBNDX vs. EVTR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Investment Grade Bond Fund (FBNDX) is 0.98%, while Eaton Vance Total Return Bond ETF (EVTR) has a volatility of 1.22%. This indicates that FBNDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EVTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FBNDX	EVTR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.98%	1.22%	-0.24%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.07%	3.16%	-0.09%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.88%	3.74%	+0.14%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.03%	4.31%	+1.72%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.02%	4.31%	+0.71%

FBNDX vs. EVTR - Expense Ratio Comparison

FBNDX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than EVTR's 0.32% expense ratio.

Dividends

FBNDX vs. EVTR - Dividend Comparison

FBNDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.63%, less than EVTR's 4.77% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EVTR Eaton Vance Total Return Bond ETF	4.77%	4.51%	4.26%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FBNDX Fidelity Investment Grade Bond Fund	3.63%	3.87%	3.34%	3.56%	1.98%	1.34%	4.70%	2.75%	2.86%	2.18%	2.72%	2.66%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FBNDX and EVTR in my portfolio?

FBNDX and EVTR have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FBNDX or EVTR?

EVTR has higher volatility (1.22%) compared to FBNDX (0.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FBNDX dropped -42.76% vs EVTR's -4.08%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EVTR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.82 vs 0.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.