FBNDX vs. FTHRX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Investment Grade Bond Fund (FBNDX) and Fidelity Intermediate Bond Fund (FTHRX).
FBNDX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Aug 6, 1971. FTHRX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on May 23, 1975.
Performance
FBNDX vs. FTHRX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FBNDX vs. FTHRX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FBNDX Fidelity Investment Grade Bond Fund | -0.50% | 7.37% | 0.93% | 6.51% | -14.04% | -1.13% | 9.79% | 9.82% | -0.35% | 3.92% |
FTHRX Fidelity Intermediate Bond Fund | -0.49% | 6.89% | 3.25% | 5.55% | -9.17% | -1.60% | 7.06% | 7.20% | 0.52% | 2.31% |
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FBNDX having a -0.50% return and FTHRX slightly higher at -0.49%. Over the past 10 years, FBNDX has outperformed FTHRX with an annualized return of 2.21%, while FTHRX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.07% annualized return.
FBNDX
- 1D
- 0.56%
- 1M
- -2.30%
- YTD
- -0.50%
- 6M
- 0.36%
- 1Y
- 3.77%
- 3Y*
- 3.56%
- 5Y*
- 0.23%
- 10Y*
- 2.21%
FTHRX
- 1D
- 0.29%
- 1M
- -1.72%
- YTD
- -0.49%
- 6M
- 0.55%
- 1Y
- 3.89%
- 3Y*
- 4.22%
- 5Y*
- 1.13%
- 10Y*
- 2.07%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FBNDX vs. FTHRX - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both FBNDX and FTHRX have an expense ratio of 0.45%.
Return for Risk
FBNDX vs. FTHRX — Risk / Return Rank
FBNDX
FTHRX
FBNDX vs. FTHRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Investment Grade Bond Fund (FBNDX) and Fidelity Intermediate Bond Fund (FTHRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FBNDX | FTHRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.96 | 1.41 | -0.45 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.39 | 2.11 | -0.73 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.26 | -0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.73 | 2.19 | -0.46 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.05 | 7.84 | -2.79 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FBNDX | FTHRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.96 | 1.41 | -0.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.04 | 0.28 | -0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.44 | 0.61 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.53 | 0.91 | -0.39 |
Correlation
The correlation between FBNDX and FTHRX is 0.81, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FBNDX vs. FTHRX - Dividend Comparison
FBNDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.58%, more than FTHRX's 3.35% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FBNDX Fidelity Investment Grade Bond Fund | 3.58% | 3.87% | 3.34% | 3.56% | 1.98% | 1.34% | 4.70% | 2.75% | 2.86% | 2.18% | 2.72% | 2.66% |
FTHRX Fidelity Intermediate Bond Fund | 3.35% | 3.59% | 3.49% | 2.94% | 1.55% | 1.53% | 4.16% | 2.49% | 2.48% | 2.20% | 2.63% | 2.13% |
Drawdowns
FBNDX vs. FTHRX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FBNDX drawdown since its inception was -42.76%, which is greater than FTHRX's maximum drawdown of -19.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBNDX and FTHRX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FBNDX | FTHRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.76% | -19.01% | -23.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.88% | -2.11% | -0.77% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.74% | -13.18% | -5.56% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -18.74% | -13.25% | -5.49% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.44% | -1.72% | -0.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.37% | -3.07% | -7.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.99% | 0.59% | +0.40% |
Volatility
FBNDX vs. FTHRX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Investment Grade Bond Fund (FBNDX) has a higher volatility of 1.63% compared to Fidelity Intermediate Bond Fund (FTHRX) at 1.11%. This indicates that FBNDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTHRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FBNDX | FTHRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.63% | 1.11% | +0.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.74% | 1.84% | +0.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.63% | 3.08% | +1.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.00% | 4.00% | +2.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.00% | 3.39% | +1.61% |