FBNDX vs. FTHRX
FBNDX (Fidelity Investment Grade Bond Fund) and FTHRX (Fidelity Intermediate Bond Fund) are both Intermediate Core Bond funds from Fidelity. Both are actively managed. Over the past 10 years, FBNDX returned 2.05%/yr vs 1.95%/yr for FTHRX. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.45% expense ratio.
Performance
FBNDX vs. FTHRX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FBNDX achieves a 0.06% return, which is significantly higher than FTHRX's -0.24% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FBNDX having a 2.05% annualized return and FTHRX not far behind at 1.95%.
FBNDX
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- 0.61%
- YTD
- 0.06%
- 6M
- 0.38%
- 1Y
- 4.11%
- 3Y*
- 3.98%
- 5Y*
- -0.03%
- 10Y*
- 2.05%
FTHRX
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- 0.22%
- YTD
- -0.24%
- 6M
- 0.16%
- 1Y
- 3.22%
- 3Y*
- 4.50%
- 5Y*
- 1.02%
- 10Y*
- 1.95%
FBNDX vs. FTHRX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FBNDX Fidelity Investment Grade Bond Fund | 0.06% | 7.37% | 0.93% | 6.51% | -14.04% | -1.13% | 9.79% | 9.82% | -0.35% | 3.92% |
FTHRX Fidelity Intermediate Bond Fund | -0.24% | 6.89% | 3.25% | 5.55% | -9.17% | -1.60% | 7.06% | 7.20% | 0.52% | 2.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between FBNDX and FTHRX is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 1980 | 0.81 |
The correlation between FBNDX and FTHRX shifts across timeframes, from 0.81 (all time) to 0.93 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FBNDX vs. FTHRX — Risk / Return Rank
FBNDX
FTHRX
FBNDX vs. FTHRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Investment Grade Bond Fund (FBNDX) and Fidelity Intermediate Bond Fund (FTHRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FBNDX | FTHRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.15 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.27 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.22 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.41 | 1.59 | -0.17 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.96 | 4.39 | -0.43 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FBNDX vs. FTHRX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FBNDX drawdown since its inception was -42.76%, which is greater than FTHRX's maximum drawdown of -19.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBNDX and FTHRX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FBNDX | FTHRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.76% | -19.01% | -23.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.02% | -2.11% | -0.91% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.09% | -2.68% | -3.41% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.74% | -13.18% | -5.56% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -18.74% | -13.25% | -5.49% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.89% | -1.48% | -0.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.34% | -3.06% | -7.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.08% | 0.76% | +0.32% |
Volatility
FBNDX vs. FTHRX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Investment Grade Bond Fund (FBNDX) has a higher volatility of 1.18% compared to Fidelity Intermediate Bond Fund (FTHRX) at 0.87%. This indicates that FBNDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTHRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FBNDX | FTHRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.18% | 0.87% | +0.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.01% | 2.09% | +0.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.09% | 2.80% | +1.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.03% | 4.04% | +1.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.03% | 3.40% | +1.63% |
FBNDX vs. FTHRX - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both FBNDX and FTHRX have an expense ratio of 0.45%.
Dividends
FBNDX vs. FTHRX - Dividend Comparison
FBNDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.92%, more than FTHRX's 3.71% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FBNDX Fidelity Investment Grade Bond Fund | 3.92% | 3.87% | 3.34% | 3.56% | 1.98% | 1.34% | 4.70% | 2.75% | 2.86% | 2.18% | 2.72% | 2.66% |
FTHRX Fidelity Intermediate Bond Fund | 3.71% | 3.59% | 3.49% | 2.94% | 1.55% | 1.53% | 4.16% | 2.49% | 2.48% | 2.20% | 2.63% | 2.13% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.90, FBNDX and FTHRX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
FBNDX has higher volatility (1.18%) compared to FTHRX (0.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FBNDX dropped -42.76% vs FTHRX's -19.01%.
FTHRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.20 vs 1.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FBNDX and FTHRX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer