PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FBL vs. FB2A.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FBL vs. FB2A.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares 2x Long META Daily ETF (FBL) and Meta Platforms Inc (FB2A.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FBL vs. FB2A.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
FBL
GraniteShares 2x Long META Daily ETF
-27.59%0.50%112.72%341.59%-1.22%
FB2A.DE
Meta Platforms Inc
-11.33%11.53%65.77%200.94%-2.28%
Different Trading Currencies

FBL is traded in USD, while FB2A.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the FB2A.DE values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FBL achieves a -27.59% return, which is significantly lower than FB2A.DE's -11.33% return.


FBL

1D
2.53%
1M
-23.32%
YTD
-27.59%
6M
-42.06%
1Y
-23.67%
3Y*
44.94%
5Y*
10Y*

FB2A.DE

1D
4.18%
1M
-10.59%
YTD
-11.33%
6M
-18.54%
1Y
0.47%
3Y*
40.94%
5Y*
14.43%
10Y*
17.64%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FBL vs. FB2A.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FBL
FBL Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
FBL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FBL Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
FBL Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
FBL Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
FBL Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

FB2A.DE
FB2A.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
FB2A.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FB2A.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
FB2A.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
FB2A.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
FB2A.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FBL vs. FB2A.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long META Daily ETF (FBL) and Meta Platforms Inc (FB2A.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FBLFB2A.DEDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.30

0.01

-0.31

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.08

0.31

-0.23

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

1.04

-0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.35

-0.01

-0.34

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.77

-0.02

-0.75

FBL vs. FB2A.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FBL Sharpe Ratio is -0.30, which is lower than the FB2A.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FBL and FB2A.DE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FBLFB2A.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.30

0.01

-0.31

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.12

0.55

+0.56

Correlation

The correlation between FBL and FB2A.DE is 0.70, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

FBL vs. FB2A.DE - Dividend Comparison

FBL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.86%, more than FB2A.DE's 0.31% yield.


TTM202520242023
FBL
GraniteShares 2x Long META Daily ETF
2.86%2.07%0.00%51.58%
FB2A.DE
Meta Platforms Inc
0.31%0.28%0.28%0.00%

Drawdowns

FBL vs. FB2A.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FBL drawdown since its inception was -61.15%, smaller than the maximum FB2A.DE drawdown of -76.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBL and FB2A.DE.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FBLFB2A.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.15%

-72.11%

+10.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-61.03%

-32.82%

-28.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-72.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-72.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-53.07%

-28.46%

-24.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.87%

-14.75%

-0.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

27.41%

13.63%

+13.78%

Volatility

FBL vs. FB2A.DE - Volatility Comparison

GraniteShares 2x Long META Daily ETF (FBL) has a higher volatility of 27.60% compared to Meta Platforms Inc (FB2A.DE) at 13.34%. This indicates that FBL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FB2A.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FBLFB2A.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

27.60%

13.34%

+14.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

54.08%

25.03%

+29.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

79.50%

37.12%

+42.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

70.82%

41.66%

+29.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

70.82%

36.74%

+34.08%