FBL vs. FNGU
Compare and contrast key facts about GraniteShares 2x Long META Daily ETF (FBL) and MicroSectors FANG+™ Index 3X Leveraged ETN (FNGU).
FBL and FNGU are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FBL is an actively managed fund by GraniteShares. It was launched on Dec 12, 2022. FNGU is a passively managed fund by Bank of Montreal that tracks the performance of the NYSE FANG (TR) (300%). It was launched on Jan 22, 2018.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: FBL or FNGU.
Key characteristics
FBL | FNGU | |
---|---|---|
YTD Return | 112.27% | 126.45% |
1Y Return | 126.01% | 168.87% |
Sharpe Ratio | 1.86 | 2.63 |
Sortino Ratio | 2.61 | 2.73 |
Omega Ratio | 1.36 | 1.37 |
Calmar Ratio | 3.78 | 3.04 |
Martin Ratio | 10.44 | 10.86 |
Ulcer Index | 12.74% | 17.24% |
Daily Std Dev | 71.47% | 71.12% |
Max Drawdown | -35.25% | -92.34% |
Current Drawdown | -6.71% | -5.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between FBL and FNGU is 0.68, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
FBL vs. FNGU - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, FBL achieves a 112.27% return, which is significantly lower than FNGU's 126.45% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FBL vs. FNGU - Expense Ratio Comparison
FBL has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than FNGU's 0.95% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
FBL vs. FNGU - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long META Daily ETF (FBL) and MicroSectors FANG+™ Index 3X Leveraged ETN (FNGU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
FBL vs. FNGU - Dividend Comparison
FBL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 24.30%, while FNGU has not paid dividends to shareholders.
TTM | 2023 | |
---|---|---|
GraniteShares 2x Long META Daily ETF | 24.30% | 51.58% |
MicroSectors FANG+™ Index 3X Leveraged ETN | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
FBL vs. FNGU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FBL drawdown since its inception was -35.25%, smaller than the maximum FNGU drawdown of -92.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBL and FNGU. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
FBL vs. FNGU - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for GraniteShares 2x Long META Daily ETF (FBL) is 16.02%, while MicroSectors FANG+™ Index 3X Leveraged ETN (FNGU) has a volatility of 18.92%. This indicates that FBL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FNGU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.