FBKWX vs. FTBFX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FBKWX (Fidelity Advisor Total Bond Fund Class Z) and FTBFX (Fidelity Total Bond Fund) are both mutual funds - FBKWX is a Total Bond Market fund managed by Fidelity, while FTBFX is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund actively managed by Fidelity. Over the past 10 years, FBKWX returned 2.49%/yr vs 2.47%/yr for FTBFX. With a 0.95 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. FBKWX charges 0.36%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for FTBFX.

Performance

FBKWX vs. FTBFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Total Bond Fund Class Z (FBKWX) and Fidelity Total Bond Fund (FTBFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FBKWX achieves a 0.61% return, which is significantly higher than FTBFX's 0.57% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FBKWX having a 2.49% annualized return and FTBFX not far behind at 2.47%.

FBKWX

• 1D: 0.10%
• 1M: 0.47%
• YTD: 0.61%
• 6M: 0.45%
• 1Y: 5.84%
• 3Y*: 4.78%
• 5Y*: 0.69%
• 10Y*: 2.49%

FTBFX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.47%
• YTD: 0.57%
• 6M: 0.40%
• 1Y: 5.75%
• 3Y*: 4.84%
• 5Y*: 0.76%
• 10Y*: 2.47%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FBKWX vs. FTBFX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FBKWX Fidelity Advisor Total Bond Fund Class Z	0.61%	7.60%	2.20%	6.56%	-13.55%	-0.27%	9.46%	9.88%	-0.56%	4.39%
FTBFX Fidelity Total Bond Fund	0.57%	7.50%	2.13%	7.25%	-13.58%	-0.44%	9.34%	9.89%	-0.66%	4.19%

Correlation

The correlation between FBKWX and FTBFX is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.95
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.96
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.97
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.96
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2015	0.95

The correlation between FBKWX and FTBFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FBKWX vs. FTBFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FBKWX

FBKWX Risk / Return Rank: 27
FBKWX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 27
FBKWX Sortino Ratio Rank: 29
FBKWX Omega Ratio Rank: 25
FBKWX Calmar Ratio Rank: 29
FBKWX Martin Ratio Rank: 24

FTBFX

FTBFX Risk / Return Rank: 27
FTBFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 28
FTBFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
FTBFX Omega Ratio Rank: 27
FTBFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 28
FTBFX Martin Ratio Rank: 24

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FBKWX vs. FTBFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Total Bond Fund Class Z (FBKWX) and Fidelity Total Bond Fund (FTBFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FBKWX	FTBFX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.48	1.49	-0.02
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.23	2.24	-0.02
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.27	-0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.03	1.99	+0.04
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.08	6.10	-0.02
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FBKWX vs. FTBFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FBKWX Sharpe Ratio is 1.48, which is comparable to the FTBFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FBKWX and FTBFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FBKWX	FTBFX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.48	1.49	-0.02
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.12	0.13	-0.01
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.53	0.52	0.00
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.56	0.93	-0.37

Drawdowns

FBKWX vs. FTBFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FBKWX drawdown since its inception was -18.31%, roughly equal to the maximum FTBFX drawdown of -18.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBKWX and FTBFX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FBKWX	FTBFX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.31%	-18.25%	-0.06%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.88%	-2.89%	+0.01%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-5.82%	-5.82%	0.00%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.31%	-18.25%	-0.06%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-18.31%	-18.25%	-0.06%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.29%	-1.31%	+0.02%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.66%	-2.32%	-1.34%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.96%	0.94%	+0.02%

Volatility

FBKWX vs. FTBFX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Total Bond Fund Class Z (FBKWX) and Fidelity Total Bond Fund (FTBFX) have volatilities of 1.35% and 1.40%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FBKWX	FTBFX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.35%	1.40%	-0.05%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.80%	2.80%	0.00%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.98%	3.88%	+0.10%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.70%	5.67%	+0.03%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.76%	4.73%	+0.03%

FBKWX vs. FTBFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FBKWX has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is lower than FTBFX's 0.45% expense ratio.

Dividends

FBKWX vs. FTBFX - Dividend Comparison

FBKWX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.44%, more than FTBFX's 4.36% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FBKWX Fidelity Advisor Total Bond Fund Class Z	4.44%	4.45%	4.22%	3.52%	2.59%	1.97%	5.32%	3.11%	3.30%	3.07%	3.71%	3.38%
FTBFX Fidelity Total Bond Fund	4.36%	4.36%	4.15%	4.15%	2.54%	1.89%	5.22%	3.03%	3.19%	2.97%	3.61%	3.30%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FBKWX and FTBFX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.95, FBKWX and FTBFX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FBKWX or FTBFX?

FTBFX has higher volatility (1.40%) compared to FBKWX (1.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FBKWX dropped -18.31% vs FTBFX's -18.25%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FTBFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.49 vs 1.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.