FBKWX vs. FTBFX
FBKWX (Fidelity Advisor Total Bond Fund Class Z) and FTBFX (Fidelity Total Bond Fund) are both mutual funds - FBKWX is a Total Bond Market fund managed by Fidelity, while FTBFX is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund actively managed by Fidelity. Over the past 10 years, FBKWX returned 2.47%/yr vs 2.46%/yr for FTBFX. With a 0.95 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. FBKWX charges 0.36%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for FTBFX.
Performance
FBKWX vs. FTBFX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FBKWX having a 0.82% return and FTBFX slightly lower at 0.78%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FBKWX having a 2.47% annualized return and FTBFX not far behind at 2.46%.
FBKWX
- 1D
- 0.42%
- 1M
- 0.89%
- YTD
- 0.82%
- 6M
- 0.97%
- 1Y
- 4.84%
- 3Y*
- 4.78%
- 5Y*
- 0.64%
- 10Y*
- 2.47%
FTBFX
- 1D
- 0.42%
- 1M
- 0.78%
- YTD
- 0.78%
- 6M
- 0.92%
- 1Y
- 4.64%
- 3Y*
- 4.84%
- 5Y*
- 0.69%
- 10Y*
- 2.46%
FBKWX vs. FTBFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FBKWX Fidelity Advisor Total Bond Fund Class Z | 0.82% | 7.60% | 2.20% | 6.56% | -13.55% | -0.27% | 9.46% | 9.88% | -0.56% | 4.39% |
FTBFX Fidelity Total Bond Fund | 0.78% | 7.50% | 2.13% | 7.25% | -13.58% | -0.44% | 9.34% | 9.89% | -0.66% | 4.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between FBKWX and FTBFX is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2015 | 0.95 |
The correlation between FBKWX and FTBFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FBKWX vs. FTBFX — Risk / Return Rank
FBKWX
FTBFX
FBKWX vs. FTBFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Total Bond Fund Class Z (FBKWX) and Fidelity Total Bond Fund (FTBFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FBKWX | FTBFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.22 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.72 | 1.65 | +0.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.83 | 4.71 | +0.12 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FBKWX vs. FTBFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FBKWX drawdown since its inception was -18.31%, roughly equal to the maximum FTBFX drawdown of -18.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBKWX and FTBFX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FBKWX | FTBFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.31% | -18.25% | -0.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.88% | -2.89% | +0.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.82% | -5.82% | 0.00% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.31% | -18.25% | -0.06% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -18.31% | -18.25% | -0.06% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.08% | -1.10% | +0.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.65% | -2.32% | -1.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.03% | 1.01% | +0.02% |
Volatility
FBKWX vs. FTBFX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Advisor Total Bond Fund Class Z (FBKWX) and Fidelity Total Bond Fund (FTBFX) have volatilities of 1.18% and 1.24%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FBKWX | FTBFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.18% | 1.24% | -0.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.87% | 2.91% | -0.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.95% | 3.83% | +0.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.71% | 5.68% | +0.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.76% | 4.74% | +0.02% |
FBKWX vs. FTBFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FBKWX has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is lower than FTBFX's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
FBKWX vs. FTBFX - Dividend Comparison
FBKWX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.44%, more than FTBFX's 4.35% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FBKWX Fidelity Advisor Total Bond Fund Class Z | 4.44% | 4.45% | 4.22% | 3.52% | 2.59% | 1.97% | 5.32% | 3.11% | 3.30% | 3.07% | 3.71% | 3.38% |
FTBFX Fidelity Total Bond Fund | 4.35% | 4.36% | 4.15% | 4.15% | 2.54% | 1.89% | 5.22% | 3.03% | 3.19% | 2.97% | 3.61% | 3.30% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, FBKWX and FTBFX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
FTBFX has higher volatility (1.24%) compared to FBKWX (1.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FBKWX dropped -18.31% vs FTBFX's -18.25%.
FBKWX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.26 vs 1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FBKWX and FTBFX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer