PortfoliosLab logo
FBKWX vs. JHNBX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between FBKWX and JHNBX is -0.95. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


Performance

FBKWX vs. JHNBX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Total Bond Fund Class Z (FBKWX) and John Hancock Bond Fund (JHNBX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Daily Std Dev

FBKWX:

3.46%

JHNBX:

5.47%

Max Drawdown

FBKWX:

-0.32%

JHNBX:

-20.10%

Current Drawdown

FBKWX:

-0.32%

JHNBX:

-8.09%

Returns By Period


FBKWX

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

JHNBX

YTD

1.19%

1M

1.14%

6M

0.27%

1Y

4.67%

5Y*

-0.32%

10Y*

1.56%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FBKWX vs. JHNBX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FBKWX has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is lower than JHNBX's 0.76% expense ratio.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

FBKWX vs. JHNBX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FBKWX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FBKWX is 8080
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FBKWX is 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FBKWX is 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FBKWX is 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FBKWX is 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FBKWX is 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

JHNBX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of JHNBX is 6868
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of JHNBX is 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of JHNBX is 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of JHNBX is 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of JHNBX is 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of JHNBX is 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

FBKWX vs. JHNBX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Total Bond Fund Class Z (FBKWX) and John Hancock Bond Fund (JHNBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.



Loading data...

Dividends

FBKWX vs. JHNBX - Dividend Comparison

FBKWX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.60%, more than JHNBX's 3.92% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
FBKWX
Fidelity Advisor Total Bond Fund Class Z
4.60%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
JHNBX
John Hancock Bond Fund
3.92%4.23%3.80%3.59%3.51%3.88%3.75%3.52%3.23%3.20%3.51%4.46%

Drawdowns

FBKWX vs. JHNBX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FBKWX drawdown since its inception was -0.32%, smaller than the maximum JHNBX drawdown of -20.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBKWX and JHNBX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

FBKWX vs. JHNBX - Volatility Comparison


Loading data...